On 05/15/2017 12:11 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年05月12日 09:41, Zhang Chen wrote:
>> COLO-Proxy just focus on packet payload, So we skip vnet header.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> net/colo-compare.c | 12 +++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
>> index cb0b04e..bf565f3 100644
>> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
>> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
>> @@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
>> */
>> static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt,
>> int offset)
>> {
>> + int offset_all;
>> +
>> if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
>> char pri_ip_src[20], pri_ip_dst[20], sec_ip_src[20],
>> sec_ip_dst[20];
>> @@ -201,9 +203,12 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet
>> *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
>> sec_ip_src, sec_ip_dst);
>> }
>> + offset_all = ppkt->vnet_hdr_len + offset;
>
> How about just keep using offset by increasing it with vnet_hdr_len?
OK, I will fix it in next version.
Thanks
Zhang Chen
>
> Thanks
>
>> +
>> if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
>> - return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset,
>> - spkt->size - offset);
>> + return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset_all,
>> + spkt->data + offset_all,
>> + spkt->size - offset_all);
>> } else {
>> trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
>> return -1;
>> @@ -261,8 +266,9 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt,
>> Packet *ppkt)
>> */
>> if (ptcp->th_off > 5) {
>> ptrdiff_t tcp_offset;
>> +
>> tcp_offset = ppkt->transport_header - (uint8_t *)ppkt->data
>> - + (ptcp->th_off * 4);
>> + + (ptcp->th_off * 4) - ppkt->vnet_hdr_len;
>> res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, tcp_offset);
>> } else if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
>> res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
>
>
>
> .
>
--
Thanks
Zhang Chen