Our defacto coding style strongly prefers /* */ style comments
over the single-line // style, and checkpatch enforces this,
but we don't actually document this. Mention it in CODING_STYLE.

Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 CODING_STYLE | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
index f53180b..2fa0c0b 100644
--- a/CODING_STYLE
+++ b/CODING_STYLE
@@ -116,3 +116,10 @@ if (a == 1) {
 Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
 Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
 even when the constant is on the right.
+
+7. Comment style
+
+We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments.
+
+Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of
+consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.
-- 
2.7.4

On Fri, 02/03 17:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Our defacto coding style strongly prefers /* */ style comments
> over the single-line // style, and checkpatch enforces this,
> but we don't actually document this. Mention it in CODING_STYLE.
> 
> Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  CODING_STYLE | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
> index f53180b..2fa0c0b 100644
> --- a/CODING_STYLE
> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
> @@ -116,3 +116,10 @@ if (a == 1) {
>  Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
>  Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
>  even when the constant is on the right.
> +
> +7. Comment style
> +
> +We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments.
> +
> +Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of
> +consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

Le 03/02/2017 à 18:58, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> Our defacto coding style strongly prefers /* */ style comments
> over the single-line // style, and checkpatch enforces this,
> but we don't actually document this. Mention it in CODING_STYLE.
> 
> Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  CODING_STYLE | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
> index f53180b..2fa0c0b 100644
> --- a/CODING_STYLE
> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
> @@ -116,3 +116,10 @@ if (a == 1) {
>  Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
>  Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
>  even when the constant is on the right.
> +
> +7. Comment style
> +
> +We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments.
> +
> +Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of
> +consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.
> 

Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:58:42PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Our defacto coding style strongly prefers /* */ style comments
> over the single-line // style, and checkpatch enforces this,
> but we don't actually document this. Mention it in CODING_STYLE.
> 
> Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  CODING_STYLE | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

03.02.2017 20:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Our defacto coding style strongly prefers /* */ style comments
> over the single-line // style, and checkpatch enforces this,
> but we don't actually document this. Mention it in CODING_STYLE.

Applied to -trivial, thanks!

/mjt