On Wed, 11/28 21:49, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Two small changes I'd like here:
>
> On 28/11/18 15:35, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > def _add_to_queue(self, user, m, queue):
> > for x in [m] + list(m.get_patches()):
> > - Queue.objects.get_or_create(user=user, message=x, name=queue)
> > + q, created = Queue.objects.get_or_create(user=user, message=x, name=queue)
> > + if created:
> > + emit_event("MessageQueued", message=x, queue=q)
>
> I'd "explode" queue into name and user here. The idea is that we could
> have something generic like this in mods/email.py:
>
> diff --git a/mods/email.py b/mods/email.py
> index 91c7d28..3ab1a73 100644
> --- a/mods/email.py
> +++ b/mods/email.py
> @@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ Email information is configured in "INI" style:
> BooleanSchema("reply_subject", "Set replying
> subject",
> desc='Whether to set Subject to
> "Re: xxx", if the event has an associated email message',
> default=True),
> + BooleanSchema("to_user", "Send to user",
> + desc='Whether to set To to a user
> email, if the event has an associated email message',
> + default=True),
> StringSchema("to", "To", desc="Send email to"),
> StringSchema("cc", "Cc", desc="Cc list"),
> StringSchema("subject_template", "Subject
> template",
> @@ -246,6 +249,8 @@ Email information is configured in "INI" style:
> headers["Reply-To"] = "<%s>" % mo.project.mailing_list
> if nt["reply_subject"] and mo:
> subject = "Re: " + mo.subject if not
> mo.subject.startswith("Re:") else mo.subject
> + if nt["to_user"] and 'user' in params:
> + to += params['user'].email
> if not (subject and body and (to or cc)):
> continue
> headers["Subject"] = subject
>
> ... that would result in sending the message to the user that configured
> a WatchQuery.
Sounds good, will change.
>
> >
> > def _drop_from_queue(self, user, m, queue):
> > query = Queue.objects.filter(user=user, message__in=m.get_patches() + [m],
> > name=queue)
> > + for q in query:
> > + emit_event("MessageDropping", message=q.message, queue=q)
>
> Dropped?
This event is before the q.delete() call, so dropping is more precise. What do you think?
>
> > q.delete()
> >
> > def _update_watch_queue(self, series):
> >
>
Fam
_______________________________________________
Patchew-devel mailing list
Patchew-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patchew-devel