include/net/sock.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- net/core/sock.c | 20 ++------------------ net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Syzkaller reported a false positive deadlock involving
the nl socket lock and the subflow socket lock:
MPTCP: kernel_bind error, err=-98
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor998/6520 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880795718a0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline]
ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET);
lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by syz-executor998/6520:
#0: ffffffff8d176c50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:802
#1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_lock net/netlink/genetlink.c:33 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x3e0/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:790
#2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline]
#2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 6520 Comm: syz-executor998 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2944 [inline]
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2987 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3776 [inline]
__lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
lock_sock_fast+0x36/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3229
mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738
inet_release+0x12e/0x280 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:431
__sock_release net/socket.c:649 [inline]
sock_release+0x87/0x1b0 net/socket.c:677
mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket+0x238/0x2c0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:900
mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr+0x359/0x930 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1170
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731
genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline]
genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792
netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504
genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline]
netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340
netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]
sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724
sock_no_sendpage+0x101/0x150 net/core/sock.c:2980
kernel_sendpage.part.0+0x1a0/0x340 net/socket.c:3504
kernel_sendpage net/socket.c:3501 [inline]
sock_sendpage+0xe5/0x140 net/socket.c:1003
pipe_to_sendpage+0x2ad/0x380 fs/splice.c:364
splice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:418 [inline]
__splice_from_pipe+0x43e/0x8a0 fs/splice.c:562
splice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:597 [inline]
generic_splice_sendpage+0xd4/0x140 fs/splice.c:746
do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline]
direct_splice_actor+0x110/0x180 fs/splice.c:936
splice_direct_to_actor+0x34b/0x8c0 fs/splice.c:891
do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:979
do_sendfile+0xae9/0x1240 fs/read_write.c:1249
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1314 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1300 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1300
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f215cb69969
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc96bb3868 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f215cbad072 RCX: 00007f215cb69969
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R09: 00007ffc96bb3a08
R10: 0000000100000002 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc96bb387c
R13: 431bde82d7b634db R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
the problem originates from uncorrect lock annotation in the mptcp
code and is only visible since commit 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct
the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations"), but is present since
the port-based endpoint support initial implementation.
This patch addresses the issue introducing a nested variant of
lock_sock_fast() and using it in the relevant code path.
Fixes: 1729cf186d8a ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Fixes: 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations")
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1dd53f7a89b299d59eaf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/core/sock.c | 20 ++------------------
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index c005c3c750e8..b5096e20fba5 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1623,7 +1623,36 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
#define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
-bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+
+/**
+ * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock
+ * @sk: socket
+ *
+ * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block
+ * return false if fast path is taken:
+ *
+ * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled
+ *
+ * return true if slow path is taken:
+ *
+ * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
+ */
+static inline bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */
+ mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+
+ return __lock_sock_fast(sk);
+}
+
+/* fast socket lock variant for caller already helding a [different] socket lock */
+static inline bool lock_sock_fast_nested(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING, 0, _RET_IP_);
+
+ return __lock_sock_fast(sk);
+}
/**
* unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 512e629f9780..7060d183216e 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3210,24 +3210,8 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock);
-/**
- * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock
- * @sk: socket
- *
- * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block
- * return false if fast path is taken:
- *
- * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled
- *
- * return true if slow path is taken:
- *
- * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
- */
-bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
+bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
{
- /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */
- mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
-
might_sleep();
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
@@ -3256,7 +3240,7 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
return true;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock_fast);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lock_sock_fast);
int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
bool timeval, bool time32)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 6b334f9b6242..e521462016c5 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp = tcp_jiffies32;
mptcp_for_each_subflow(mptcp_sk(sk), subflow) {
struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
- bool slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
+ bool slow = lock_sock_fast_nested(ssk);
sock_orphan(ssk);
unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
--
2.26.3
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Syzkaller reported a false positive deadlock involving
> the nl socket lock and the subflow socket lock:
>
> MPTCP: kernel_bind error, err=-98
> ============================================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> syz-executor998/6520 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff8880795718a0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline]
> ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET);
> lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> 3 locks held by syz-executor998/6520:
> #0: ffffffff8d176c50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:802
> #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_lock net/netlink/genetlink.c:33 [inline]
> #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x3e0/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:790
> #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline]
> #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 PID: 6520 Comm: syz-executor998 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2944 [inline]
> check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2987 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3776 [inline]
> __lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
> lock_sock_fast+0x36/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3229
> mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738
> inet_release+0x12e/0x280 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:431
> __sock_release net/socket.c:649 [inline]
> sock_release+0x87/0x1b0 net/socket.c:677
> mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket+0x238/0x2c0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:900
> mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr+0x359/0x930 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1170
> genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731
> genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline]
> genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504
> genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803
> netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline]
> netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340
> netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929
> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]
> sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724
> sock_no_sendpage+0x101/0x150 net/core/sock.c:2980
> kernel_sendpage.part.0+0x1a0/0x340 net/socket.c:3504
> kernel_sendpage net/socket.c:3501 [inline]
> sock_sendpage+0xe5/0x140 net/socket.c:1003
> pipe_to_sendpage+0x2ad/0x380 fs/splice.c:364
> splice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:418 [inline]
> __splice_from_pipe+0x43e/0x8a0 fs/splice.c:562
> splice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:597 [inline]
> generic_splice_sendpage+0xd4/0x140 fs/splice.c:746
> do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline]
> direct_splice_actor+0x110/0x180 fs/splice.c:936
> splice_direct_to_actor+0x34b/0x8c0 fs/splice.c:891
> do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:979
> do_sendfile+0xae9/0x1240 fs/read_write.c:1249
> __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1314 [inline]
> __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1300 [inline]
> __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1300
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> RIP: 0033:0x7f215cb69969
> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffc96bb3868 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f215cbad072 RCX: 00007f215cb69969
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000005
> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R09: 00007ffc96bb3a08
> R10: 0000000100000002 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc96bb387c
> R13: 431bde82d7b634db R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
>
> the problem originates from uncorrect lock annotation in the mptcp
> code and is only visible since commit 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct
> the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations"), but is present since
> the port-based endpoint support initial implementation.
>
> This patch addresses the issue introducing a nested variant of
> lock_sock_fast() and using it in the relevant code path.
>
> Fixes: 1729cf186d8a ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
> Fixes: 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations")
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1dd53f7a89b299d59eaf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/net/sock.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> net/core/sock.c | 20 ++------------------
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index c005c3c750e8..b5096e20fba5 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -1623,7 +1623,36 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
> SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
> #define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
>
> -bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
> +bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
I think things look fine from an MPTCP perspective, but I have a couple of
questions about the sock.{h,c} changes.
Do you expect __lock_sock_fast() to be useful outside of
lock_sock_fast()/lock_sock_fast_nested()?
> +
> +/**
> + * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock
> + * @sk: socket
> + *
> + * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block
> + * return false if fast path is taken:
> + *
> + * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled
> + *
> + * return true if slow path is taken:
> + *
> + * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
> + */
> +static inline bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */
> + mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> +
> + return __lock_sock_fast(sk);
> +}
I'm curious why these are inlined now rather than implemented in sock.c?
Adding lock_sock_fast_nested() as a regular function would allow
__lock_sock_fast() to be static in sock.c, where the optimizer might do
better with handling the two variants.
> +
> +/* fast socket lock variant for caller already helding a [different] socket lock */
Typo: "holding"
Thanks,
Mat
> +static inline bool lock_sock_fast_nested(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING, 0, _RET_IP_);
> +
> + return __lock_sock_fast(sk);
> +}
>
> /**
> * unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 512e629f9780..7060d183216e 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -3210,24 +3210,8 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock);
>
> -/**
> - * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock
> - * @sk: socket
> - *
> - * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block
> - * return false if fast path is taken:
> - *
> - * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled
> - *
> - * return true if slow path is taken:
> - *
> - * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
> - */
> -bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
> +bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
> {
> - /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */
> - mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> -
> might_sleep();
> spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
>
> @@ -3256,7 +3240,7 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
> spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
> return true;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock_fast);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lock_sock_fast);
>
> int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
> bool timeval, bool time32)
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 6b334f9b6242..e521462016c5 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp = tcp_jiffies32;
> mptcp_for_each_subflow(mptcp_sk(sk), subflow) {
> struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
> - bool slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
> + bool slow = lock_sock_fast_nested(ssk);
>
> sock_orphan(ssk);
> unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
> --
> 2.26.3
>
>
>
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 15:28 -0700, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> > Syzkaller reported a false positive deadlock involving
> > the nl socket lock and the subflow socket lock:
> >
> > MPTCP: kernel_bind error, err=-98
> > ============================================
> > WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> > 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> > --------------------------------------------
> > syz-executor998/6520 is trying to acquire lock:
> > ffff8880795718a0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline]
> > ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720
> >
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> > Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> >
> > CPU0
> > ----
> > lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET);
> > lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET);
> >
> > *** DEADLOCK ***
> >
> > May be due to missing lock nesting notation
> >
> > 3 locks held by syz-executor998/6520:
> > #0: ffffffff8d176c50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:802
> > #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_lock net/netlink/genetlink.c:33 [inline]
> > #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x3e0/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:790
> > #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline]
> > #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720
> >
> > stack backtrace:
> > CPU: 1 PID: 6520 Comm: syz-executor998 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
> > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> > Call Trace:
> > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> > dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> > print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2944 [inline]
> > check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2987 [inline]
> > validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3776 [inline]
> > __lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
> > lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
> > lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
> > lock_sock_fast+0x36/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3229
> > mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738
> > inet_release+0x12e/0x280 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:431
> > __sock_release net/socket.c:649 [inline]
> > sock_release+0x87/0x1b0 net/socket.c:677
> > mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket+0x238/0x2c0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:900
> > mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr+0x359/0x930 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1170
> > genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731
> > genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline]
> > genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792
> > netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504
> > genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803
> > netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline]
> > netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340
> > netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929
> > sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]
> > sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724
> > sock_no_sendpage+0x101/0x150 net/core/sock.c:2980
> > kernel_sendpage.part.0+0x1a0/0x340 net/socket.c:3504
> > kernel_sendpage net/socket.c:3501 [inline]
> > sock_sendpage+0xe5/0x140 net/socket.c:1003
> > pipe_to_sendpage+0x2ad/0x380 fs/splice.c:364
> > splice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:418 [inline]
> > __splice_from_pipe+0x43e/0x8a0 fs/splice.c:562
> > splice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:597 [inline]
> > generic_splice_sendpage+0xd4/0x140 fs/splice.c:746
> > do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline]
> > direct_splice_actor+0x110/0x180 fs/splice.c:936
> > splice_direct_to_actor+0x34b/0x8c0 fs/splice.c:891
> > do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:979
> > do_sendfile+0xae9/0x1240 fs/read_write.c:1249
> > __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1314 [inline]
> > __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1300 [inline]
> > __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1300
> > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> > do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> > RIP: 0033:0x7f215cb69969
> > Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > RSP: 002b:00007ffc96bb3868 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028
> > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f215cbad072 RCX: 00007f215cb69969
> > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000005
> > RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R09: 00007ffc96bb3a08
> > R10: 0000000100000002 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc96bb387c
> > R13: 431bde82d7b634db R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> >
> > the problem originates from uncorrect lock annotation in the mptcp
> > code and is only visible since commit 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct
> > the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations"), but is present since
> > the port-based endpoint support initial implementation.
> >
> > This patch addresses the issue introducing a nested variant of
> > lock_sock_fast() and using it in the relevant code path.
> >
> > Fixes: 1729cf186d8a ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
> > Fixes: 2dcb96bacce3 ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations")
> > Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1dd53f7a89b299d59eaf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/net/sock.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > net/core/sock.c | 20 ++------------------
> > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > index c005c3c750e8..b5096e20fba5 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > @@ -1623,7 +1623,36 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
> > SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
> > #define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
> >
> > -bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
> > +bool __lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
>
> I think things look fine from an MPTCP perspective, but I have a couple of
> questions about the sock.{h,c} changes.
>
> Do you expect __lock_sock_fast() to be useful outside of
> lock_sock_fast()/lock_sock_fast_nested()?
No, it's just an artifact to avoid exporting more symbols.
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock
> > + * @sk: socket
> > + *
> > + * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block
> > + * return false if fast path is taken:
> > + *
> > + * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled
> > + *
> > + * return true if slow path is taken:
> > + *
> > + * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
> > + */
> > +static inline bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
> > +{
> > + /* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here. */
> > + mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> > +
> > + return __lock_sock_fast(sk);
> > +}
>
> I'm curious why these are inlined now rather than implemented in sock.c?
So that we don't have to export more symbols
> Adding lock_sock_fast_nested() as a regular function would allow
> __lock_sock_fast() to be static in sock.c, where the optimizer might do
> better with handling the two variants.
I assumed that CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y is irrelevant from performance
perspective. When for build with
# CONFIG_LOCKDEP is not set
the compiler should emit no code at all
for lock_sock_fast()/lock_sock_fast_nested(), just a direct call
to __lock_sock_fast().
> > +
> > +/* fast socket lock variant for caller already helding a [different] socket lock */
>
> Typo: "holding"
Thanks, will fix in v2,
Cheers.
Paolo
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.