From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

Resend two pm related cleanups.

The set "add sock_kmemdup helper" is accepted by upstream, so I think
similar patch (patch 1, use kmemdup helper) is valid too.

Geliang Tang (2):
  mptcp: pm: in-kernel: use kmemdup helper
  mptcp: pm: use pm variable instead of msk->pm

 net/mptcp/pm.c        | 8 ++++----
 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c | 6 ++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0

Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/13649066260

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/88e393d9b0da
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=939900


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

Hi Geliang,

On 04/03/2025 08:16, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> Resend two pm related cleanups.
> 
> The set "add sock_kmemdup helper" is accepted by upstream, so I think
> similar patch (patch 1, use kmemdup helper) is valid too.

Thank you for the follow-up!

Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.

Hi Geliang,

On 04/03/2025 08:16, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> Resend two pm related cleanups.
> 
> The set "add sock_kmemdup helper" is accepted by upstream, so I think
> similar patch (patch 1, use kmemdup helper) is valid too.

Thank you for the patches, now in our tree (feat. for net-next):

New patches for t/upstream:
- ab6672511dbe: mptcp: pm: in-kernel: use kmemdup helper
- 84e8a48a2088: mptcp: pm: use pm variable instead of msk->pm
- Results: c6a94c37f925..9b16a0d6640c (export)

Tests are now in progress:

- export:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commit/74a0c64e68823fb4b3a9f3ee1a2a8e195a12d986/checks

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.