[PATCH mptcp-next v1 1/6] mptcp: pm: use pm variable instead of msk->pm

Geliang Tang posted 6 patches 2 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH mptcp-next v1 1/6] mptcp: pm: use pm variable instead of msk->pm
Posted by Geliang Tang 2 months, 2 weeks ago
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

The variable "pm" has been defined in mptcp_pm_fully_established()
and mptcp_pm_data_reset() as "sk->pm", so use "pm" directly instead
of using "sk->pm".

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 net/mptcp/pm.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index ac7b39148bd3..1844107f6f93 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -139,13 +139,13 @@ void mptcp_pm_fully_established(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk)
 	 * be sure to serve this event only once.
 	 */
 	if (READ_ONCE(pm->work_pending) &&
-	    !(msk->pm.status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ALREADY_ESTABLISHED)))
+	    !(pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ALREADY_ESTABLISHED)))
 		mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ESTABLISHED);
 
-	if ((msk->pm.status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ALREADY_ESTABLISHED)) == 0)
+	if ((pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ALREADY_ESTABLISHED)) == 0)
 		announce = true;
 
-	msk->pm.status |= BIT(MPTCP_PM_ALREADY_ESTABLISHED);
+	pm->status |= BIT(MPTCP_PM_ALREADY_ESTABLISHED);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&pm->lock);
 
 	if (announce)
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_data_reset(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	WRITE_ONCE(pm->addr_signal, 0);
 	WRITE_ONCE(pm->remote_deny_join_id0, false);
 	pm->status = 0;
-	bitmap_fill(msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1);
+	bitmap_fill(pm->id_avail_bitmap, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1);
 }
 
 void mptcp_pm_data_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
-- 
2.43.0