[PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/2] patches for new MPTCP subflow subtest

Geliang Tang posted 2 patches 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next tags/patchew/cover.1715753802.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn
There is a newer version of this series
MAINTAINERS                                    |  1 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile           |  2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/mptcp_pm_nl_ctl.c  |  1 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 17 ++++++-----------
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
create mode 120000 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/mptcp_pm_nl_ctl.c
[PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/2] patches for new MPTCP subflow subtest
Posted by Geliang Tang 3 months, 3 weeks ago
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

v5:
 - move checkpatch.pl fix out of this set.
 - update patch 2 as Matt suggested.

v4:
 - "{*/,}" can't be used in MAINTAINERS, fix it.
 - fix checkpatch too.

v3:
 - update MAINTAINERS.
 - drop '-M' in _ss_search() as Matt suggested.

v2:
 - rename pm_nl_ctl to mptcp_pm_nl_ctl.

Geliang Tang (2):
  selftests/bpf: Add mptcp pm_nl_ctl link
  Squash to "selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest"

 MAINTAINERS                                    |  1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile           |  2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/mptcp_pm_nl_ctl.c  |  1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 17 ++++++-----------
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
 create mode 120000 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/mptcp_pm_nl_ctl.c

-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/2] patches for new MPTCP subflow subtest
Posted by MPTCP CI 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Unstable: 2 failed test(s): bpftest_test_progs-cpuv4_mptcp bpftest_test_progs-no_alu32_mptcp 🔴
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/9091069267

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/95ddedab4520
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=853294


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/2] patches for new MPTCP subflow subtest
Posted by Matthieu Baerts 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Hi Geliang,

On 15/05/2024 09:08, MPTCP CI wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
> 
> Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
> 
> Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
> 
> - KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Unstable: 2 failed test(s): bpftest_test_progs-cpuv4_mptcp bpftest_test_progs-no_alu32_mptcp 🔴

It looks like the CI doesn't like pm_nl_ctl (good we test that :) ):

> endpoint_init:FAIL:ip netns exec mptcp_ns ./mptcp_pm_nl_ctl add 10.0.1.2 flags subflow unexpected error: 256 (errno 22)

I'm not sure to understand what's wrong. Can you reproduce it on your side?

Note that if you use the Docker image, I recently added the 'bpftests'
command, only to build these tests without the kernel. It should be
useful if you want to check build errors first.

https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker/commit/d10b89

(I also added defconfig, selftests, vm-manual, vm-auto, etc. I don't
know if others can be useful.)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.