Hi Geliang,
On 29/02/2024 13:08, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:31:21PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Geliang,
>>
>> On 29/02/2024 10:51, Geliang Tang wrote:
>>> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>>>
>>> ipv4/ipv6 and v4/v6 are mixed in the output of mptcp_sockopt.sh, this patch
>>> unifies them as v4/v6.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.sh | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.sh
>>> index 6ed4aa32222f..ae59136b5bb4 100755
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.sh
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.sh
>>> @@ -130,10 +130,10 @@ do_transfer()
>>> local local_addr ip
>>> if mptcp_lib_is_v6 "${connect_addr}"; then
>>> local_addr="::"
>>> - ip=ipv6
>>> + ip=v6
>>> else
>>> local_addr="0.0.0.0"
>>> - ip=ipv4
>>> + ip=v4
>>
>> Mmh, this will change the test name (used in "mptcp_lib_result_*") and
>> this will break the tracking using the test name [1] while the test is
>> still doing the same thing.
>>
>> Maybe this patch is not worth it then, fine to see 'ipv6'. Or only
>
> Do you mean drop this patch? I agree, let's drop it.
Yes, I prefer not to modify the test name printed in the TAP format at
the end. We can modify what is displayed before.
So OK to drop it, easier.
>> display a different string in what is printed per test, what you were
>> doing in patch 5/9 from the v6, but I don't know where this patch is:
>> did you accidentally drop it?
>
> 5/9 from the v6 is merged into "v7 7/8".
Ah OK, I'm not there yet.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.