When the listener socket owning the relevant request is closed,
it frees the unaccepted subflows and that causes later deletion
of the paired MPTCP sockets.
The mptcp socket's worker can run in the time interval between such delete
operations. When that happens, any access to msk->first will cause an UaF
access, as the subflow cleanup did not cleared such field in the mptcp
socket.
Address the issue explictly traversing the listener socket accept
queue at close time and performing the needed cleanup on the pending
msk.
Note that the locking is a bit tricky, as we need to acquire the msk
socket lock, while still owning the subflow socket one.
Fixes: 86e39e04482b ("mptcp: keep track of local endpoint still available for each msk")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
v3 -> v4:
- use correct lockdep annotation when re-acquiring the listener sock lock
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 5 +++++
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 ++
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 00ba9c44933a..6d2aa41390e7 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2318,6 +2318,11 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
kfree_rcu(subflow, rcu);
} else {
/* otherwise tcp will dispose of the ssk and subflow ctx */
+ if (ssk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
+ tcp_set_state(ssk, TCP_CLOSE);
+ mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(ssk);
+ inet_csk_listen_stop(ssk);
+ }
__tcp_close(ssk, 0);
/* close acquired an extra ref */
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index ad9b02b1b3e6..95c9ace1437b 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
u32 setsockopt_seq;
char ca_name[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
+ struct mptcp_sock *dl_next;
};
#define mptcp_data_lock(sk) spin_lock_bh(&(sk)->sk_lock.slock)
@@ -610,6 +611,7 @@ void mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow);
void mptcp_subflow_send_ack(struct sock *ssk);
void mptcp_subflow_reset(struct sock *ssk);
+void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *ssk);
void mptcp_sock_graft(struct sock *sk, struct socket *parent);
struct socket *__mptcp_nmpc_socket(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 5c87a269af80..2c953703edf2 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -1723,6 +1723,56 @@ static void subflow_state_change(struct sock *sk)
}
}
+void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *listener_ssk)
+{
+ struct request_sock_queue *queue = &inet_csk(listener_ssk)->icsk_accept_queue;
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk, *next, *head = NULL;
+ struct request_sock *req;
+
+ /* build a list of all unaccepted mptcp sockets */
+ spin_lock_bh(&queue->rskq_lock);
+ for (req = queue->rskq_accept_head; req; req = req->dl_next) {
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+ struct sock *ssk = req->sk;
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk;
+
+ if (!sk_is_mptcp(ssk))
+ continue;
+
+ subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
+ if (!subflow || !subflow->conn)
+ continue;
+
+ /* skip if already in list */
+ msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
+ if (msk->dl_next || msk == head)
+ continue;
+
+ msk->dl_next = head;
+ head = msk;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&queue->rskq_lock);
+ if (!head)
+ return;
+
+ /* can't acquire the msk socket lock under the subflow one,
+ * or will cause ABBA deadlock
+ */
+ release_sock(listener_ssk);
+
+ for (msk = head; msk; msk = next) {
+ struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+ bool slow;
+
+ slow = lock_sock_fast_nested(sk);
+ next = msk->dl_next;
+ msk->first = NULL;
+ msk->dl_next = NULL;
+ unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow);
+ }
+ lock_sock(listener_ssk);
+}
+
static int subflow_ulp_init(struct sock *sk)
{
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
--
2.35.3
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Paolo Abeni wrote: > When the listener socket owning the relevant request is closed, > it frees the unaccepted subflows and that causes later deletion > of the paired MPTCP sockets. > > The mptcp socket's worker can run in the time interval between such delete > operations. When that happens, any access to msk->first will cause an UaF > access, as the subflow cleanup did not cleared such field in the mptcp > socket. > > Address the issue explictly traversing the listener socket accept > queue at close time and performing the needed cleanup on the pending > msk. > > Note that the locking is a bit tricky, as we need to acquire the msk > socket lock, while still owning the subflow socket one. > > Fixes: 86e39e04482b ("mptcp: keep track of local endpoint still available for each msk") > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> > --- > v3 -> v4: > - use correct lockdep annotation when re-acquiring the listener sock lock > --- > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 5 +++++ > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 ++ > net/mptcp/subflow.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c > index 00ba9c44933a..6d2aa41390e7 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c > @@ -2318,6 +2318,11 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, > kfree_rcu(subflow, rcu); > } else { > /* otherwise tcp will dispose of the ssk and subflow ctx */ > + if (ssk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { > + tcp_set_state(ssk, TCP_CLOSE); > + mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(ssk); > + inet_csk_listen_stop(ssk); > + } > __tcp_close(ssk, 0); > > /* close acquired an extra ref */ > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h > index ad9b02b1b3e6..95c9ace1437b 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h > @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ struct mptcp_sock { > > u32 setsockopt_seq; > char ca_name[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX]; > + struct mptcp_sock *dl_next; > }; > > #define mptcp_data_lock(sk) spin_lock_bh(&(sk)->sk_lock.slock) > @@ -610,6 +611,7 @@ void mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, > struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow); > void mptcp_subflow_send_ack(struct sock *ssk); > void mptcp_subflow_reset(struct sock *ssk); > +void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *ssk); > void mptcp_sock_graft(struct sock *sk, struct socket *parent); > struct socket *__mptcp_nmpc_socket(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c > index 5c87a269af80..2c953703edf2 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c > @@ -1723,6 +1723,56 @@ static void subflow_state_change(struct sock *sk) > } > } > > +void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *listener_ssk) > +{ > + struct request_sock_queue *queue = &inet_csk(listener_ssk)->icsk_accept_queue; > + struct mptcp_sock *msk, *next, *head = NULL; > + struct request_sock *req; > + > + /* build a list of all unaccepted mptcp sockets */ > + spin_lock_bh(&queue->rskq_lock); > + for (req = queue->rskq_accept_head; req; req = req->dl_next) { > + struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; > + struct sock *ssk = req->sk; > + struct mptcp_sock *msk; > + > + if (!sk_is_mptcp(ssk)) > + continue; > + > + subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk); > + if (!subflow || !subflow->conn) > + continue; > + > + /* skip if already in list */ > + msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn); > + if (msk->dl_next || msk == head) > + continue; > + > + msk->dl_next = head; > + head = msk; > + } > + spin_unlock_bh(&queue->rskq_lock); > + if (!head) > + return; > + > + /* can't acquire the msk socket lock under the subflow one, > + * or will cause ABBA deadlock > + */ > + release_sock(listener_ssk); > + > + for (msk = head; msk; msk = next) { > + struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk; > + bool slow; > + > + slow = lock_sock_fast_nested(sk); > + next = msk->dl_next; > + msk->first = NULL; > + msk->dl_next = NULL; > + unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow); > + } > + lock_sock(listener_ssk); Hi Paolo - I think the nested locking fix didn't make it in to v4 as posted? This lock_sock(listener_ssk) line is the one I was mentioning, and the lock_sock_fast_nested() a few lines earlier was already in v3. It's the lock_sock_nested() call in __mptcp_close_ssk() that I was suggesting this should match. Otherwise, the series looks good. Thanks for answering my v3 questions. > +} > + > static int subflow_ulp_init(struct sock *sk) > { > struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk); > -- > 2.35.3 > > > -- Mat Martineau Intel
On Mon, 2022-06-20 at 15:15 -0700, Mat Martineau wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > > When the listener socket owning the relevant request is closed, > > it frees the unaccepted subflows and that causes later deletion > > of the paired MPTCP sockets. > > > > The mptcp socket's worker can run in the time interval between such delete > > operations. When that happens, any access to msk->first will cause an UaF > > access, as the subflow cleanup did not cleared such field in the mptcp > > socket. > > > > Address the issue explictly traversing the listener socket accept > > queue at close time and performing the needed cleanup on the pending > > msk. > > > > Note that the locking is a bit tricky, as we need to acquire the msk > > socket lock, while still owning the subflow socket one. > > > > Fixes: 86e39e04482b ("mptcp: keep track of local endpoint still available for each msk") > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> > > --- > > v3 -> v4: > > - use correct lockdep annotation when re-acquiring the listener sock lock > > --- > > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 5 +++++ > > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 ++ > > net/mptcp/subflow.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c > > index 00ba9c44933a..6d2aa41390e7 100644 > > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c > > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c > > @@ -2318,6 +2318,11 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, > > kfree_rcu(subflow, rcu); > > } else { > > /* otherwise tcp will dispose of the ssk and subflow ctx */ > > + if (ssk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { > > + tcp_set_state(ssk, TCP_CLOSE); > > + mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(ssk); > > + inet_csk_listen_stop(ssk); > > + } > > __tcp_close(ssk, 0); > > > > /* close acquired an extra ref */ > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h > > index ad9b02b1b3e6..95c9ace1437b 100644 > > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h > > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h > > @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ struct mptcp_sock { > > > > u32 setsockopt_seq; > > char ca_name[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX]; > > + struct mptcp_sock *dl_next; > > }; > > > > #define mptcp_data_lock(sk) spin_lock_bh(&(sk)->sk_lock.slock) > > @@ -610,6 +611,7 @@ void mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, > > struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow); > > void mptcp_subflow_send_ack(struct sock *ssk); > > void mptcp_subflow_reset(struct sock *ssk); > > +void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *ssk); > > void mptcp_sock_graft(struct sock *sk, struct socket *parent); > > struct socket *__mptcp_nmpc_socket(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); > > > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c > > index 5c87a269af80..2c953703edf2 100644 > > --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c > > +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c > > @@ -1723,6 +1723,56 @@ static void subflow_state_change(struct sock *sk) > > } > > } > > > > +void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *listener_ssk) > > +{ > > + struct request_sock_queue *queue = &inet_csk(listener_ssk)->icsk_accept_queue; > > + struct mptcp_sock *msk, *next, *head = NULL; > > + struct request_sock *req; > > + > > + /* build a list of all unaccepted mptcp sockets */ > > + spin_lock_bh(&queue->rskq_lock); > > + for (req = queue->rskq_accept_head; req; req = req->dl_next) { > > + struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; > > + struct sock *ssk = req->sk; > > + struct mptcp_sock *msk; > > + > > + if (!sk_is_mptcp(ssk)) > > + continue; > > + > > + subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk); > > + if (!subflow || !subflow->conn) > > + continue; > > + > > + /* skip if already in list */ > > + msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn); > > + if (msk->dl_next || msk == head) > > + continue; > > + > > + msk->dl_next = head; > > + head = msk; > > + } > > + spin_unlock_bh(&queue->rskq_lock); > > + if (!head) > > + return; > > + > > + /* can't acquire the msk socket lock under the subflow one, > > + * or will cause ABBA deadlock > > + */ > > + release_sock(listener_ssk); > > + > > + for (msk = head; msk; msk = next) { > > + struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk; > > + bool slow; > > + > > + slow = lock_sock_fast_nested(sk); > > + next = msk->dl_next; > > + msk->first = NULL; > > + msk->dl_next = NULL; > > + unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow); > > + } > > + lock_sock(listener_ssk); > > Hi Paolo - > > I think the nested locking fix didn't make it in to v4 as posted? I'm not sure what/how that happened. I would swear I edited and reviewed such change... let's go for a v5, sorry. Paolo
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.