[PATCH mptcp-next v15 5/8] mptcp: add get_subflow wrapper

Geliang Tang posted 8 patches 3 years, 4 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH mptcp-next v15 5/8] mptcp: add get_subflow wrapper
Posted by Geliang Tang 3 years, 4 months ago
This patch defines a new wrapper mptcp_sched_get_subflow(), invoke
get_subflow() of msk->sched in it. Use the wrapper instead of using
mptcp_subflow_get_send() directly.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c |  9 ++++-----
 net/mptcp/protocol.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 7590e2d29f39..c6e963848b18 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1515,7 +1515,6 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_send(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	subflow->avg_pacing_rate = div_u64((u64)subflow->avg_pacing_rate * wmem +
 					   READ_ONCE(ssk->sk_pacing_rate) * burst,
 					   burst + wmem);
-	msk->last_snd = ssk;
 	msk->snd_burst = burst;
 	return ssk;
 }
@@ -1575,7 +1574,7 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 			int ret = 0;
 
 			prev_ssk = ssk;
-			ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_send(msk);
+			ssk = mptcp_sched_get_subflow(msk, false);
 
 			/* First check. If the ssk has changed since
 			 * the last round, release prev_ssk
@@ -1644,7 +1643,7 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 			 * check for a different subflow usage only after
 			 * spooling the first chunk of data
 			 */
-			xmit_ssk = first ? ssk : mptcp_subflow_get_send(mptcp_sk(sk));
+			xmit_ssk = first ? ssk : mptcp_sched_get_subflow(mptcp_sk(sk), false);
 			if (!xmit_ssk)
 				goto out;
 			if (xmit_ssk != ssk) {
@@ -2489,7 +2488,7 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
 	mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
 
 	/* first check ssk: need to kick "stale" logic */
-	ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(msk);
+	ssk = mptcp_sched_get_subflow(msk, true);
 	dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
 	if (!dfrag) {
 		if (mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk)) {
@@ -3154,7 +3153,7 @@ void __mptcp_check_push(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 		return;
 
 	if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
-		struct sock *xmit_ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_send(mptcp_sk(sk));
+		struct sock *xmit_ssk = mptcp_sched_get_subflow(mptcp_sk(sk), false);
 
 		if (xmit_ssk == ssk)
 			__mptcp_subflow_push_pending(sk, ssk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 22f3f41e1e32..91512fc25128 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -633,6 +633,22 @@ int mptcp_init_sched(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 		     struct mptcp_sched_ops *sched);
 void mptcp_release_sched(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 
+static inline struct sock *mptcp_sched_get_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk, bool reinject)
+{
+	struct mptcp_sched_data data = {
+		.sock		= msk->first,
+		.call_again	= 0,
+	};
+
+	msk->sched ? INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1(msk->sched->get_subflow,
+					  mptcp_get_subflow_default,
+					  msk, reinject, &data) :
+		     mptcp_get_subflow_default(msk, reinject, &data);
+
+	msk->last_snd = data.sock;
+	return data.sock;
+}
+
 static inline bool __mptcp_subflow_active(struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow)
 {
 	struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
-- 
2.34.1