Since full-mesh endpoint support, the reception of a single ADD_ADDR
option can cause multiple subflows creation. When such option is
accepted we increment 'add_addr_accepted' by one. When we received
a paired RM_ADDR option, we deleted all the relevant subflows,
decrementing 'add_addr_accepted' by one for each of them.

We have a similar issue for 'local_addr_used'

Fix them moving the pm endpoint accounting outside the subflow
traversal.

Fixes: 1a0d6136c5f0 ("mptcp: local addresses fullmesh")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 3186d33b5208..d18b13e3e74c 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -710,6 +710,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < rm_list->nr; i++) {
+		bool removed = false;
+
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(subflow, tmp, &msk->conn_list, node) {
 			struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
 			int how = RCV_SHUTDOWN | SEND_SHUTDOWN;
@@ -729,15 +731,19 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 			mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow);
 			spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
 
-			if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) {
-				msk->pm.add_addr_accepted--;
-				WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
-			} else if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW) {
-				msk->pm.local_addr_used--;
-			}
+			removed = true;
 			msk->pm.subflows--;
 			__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type);
 		}
+		if (!removed)
+			continue;
+
+		if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) {
+			msk->pm.add_addr_accepted--;
+			WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
+		} else if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW) {
+			msk->pm.local_addr_used--;
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.33.1