net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
A more general way to check if MPTCP_PM_ATTR_* exists in 'info'
is to use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_*) instead of
directly reading info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_*] and then checking
if it's NULL.
So this patch uses GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK() for userspace PM in
mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(), mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(),
mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(), mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit()
and mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock().
'Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>'
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
v4:
- use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in more functions as Matt suggested (thanks)
v3:
- use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock only
- drop GENL_SET_ERR_MSG as Matt suggested (thanks)
v2:
- use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in get_addr(), dump_addr() and set_flags()
too.
---
net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
index 740a10d669f8..9299ef3d2f55 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
@@ -175,14 +175,13 @@ bool mptcp_userspace_pm_is_backup(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
static struct mptcp_sock *mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(const struct genl_info *info)
{
- struct nlattr *token = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN];
struct mptcp_sock *msk;
+ struct nlattr *token;
- if (!token) {
- GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required token");
+ if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN))
return NULL;
- }
+ token = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN];
msk = mptcp_token_get_sock(genl_info_net(info), nla_get_u32(token));
if (!msk) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, token, "invalid token");
@@ -200,16 +199,14 @@ static struct mptcp_sock *mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(const struct genl_info *in
int mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
- struct nlattr *addr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry addr_val;
struct mptcp_sock *msk;
+ struct nlattr *addr;
int err = -EINVAL;
struct sock *sk;
- if (!addr) {
- GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required address");
+ if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR))
return err;
- }
msk = mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(info);
if (!msk)
@@ -217,6 +214,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+ addr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
err = mptcp_pm_parse_entry(addr, info, true, &addr_val);
if (err < 0) {
GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "error parsing local address");
@@ -309,18 +307,17 @@ void mptcp_pm_remove_addr_entry(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
int mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
- struct nlattr *id = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID];
struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *match;
struct mptcp_sock *msk;
+ struct nlattr *id;
int err = -EINVAL;
struct sock *sk;
u8 id_val;
- if (!id) {
- GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required ID");
+ if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID))
return err;
- }
+ id = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID];
id_val = nla_get_u8(id);
msk = mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(info);
@@ -362,19 +359,17 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
- struct nlattr *raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE];
- struct nlattr *laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry entry = { 0 };
struct mptcp_addr_info addr_r;
+ struct nlattr *raddr, *laddr;
struct mptcp_pm_local local;
struct mptcp_sock *msk;
int err = -EINVAL;
struct sock *sk;
- if (!laddr || !raddr) {
- GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required address(es)");
+ if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR) ||
+ GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE))
return err;
- }
msk = mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(info);
if (!msk)
@@ -382,6 +377,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+ laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
err = mptcp_pm_parse_entry(laddr, info, true, &entry);
if (err < 0) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, laddr, "error parsing local addr");
@@ -395,6 +391,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
}
entry.flags |= MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW;
+ raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE];
err = mptcp_pm_parse_addr(raddr, info, &addr_r);
if (err < 0) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, raddr, "error parsing remote addr");
@@ -483,18 +480,16 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_nl_find_ssk(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
- struct nlattr *raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE];
- struct nlattr *laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry addr_l;
struct mptcp_addr_info addr_r;
+ struct nlattr *raddr, *laddr;
struct mptcp_sock *msk;
struct sock *sk, *ssk;
int err = -EINVAL;
- if (!laddr || !raddr) {
- GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required address(es)");
+ if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR) ||
+ GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE))
return err;
- }
msk = mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(info);
if (!msk)
@@ -502,12 +497,14 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info
sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+ laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
err = mptcp_pm_parse_entry(laddr, info, true, &addr_l);
if (err < 0) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, laddr, "error parsing local addr");
goto destroy_err;
}
+ raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE];
err = mptcp_pm_parse_addr(raddr, info, &addr_r);
if (err < 0) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, raddr, "error parsing remote addr");
--
2.45.2
Hi Geliang, On 20/12/2024 09:50, Geliang Tang wrote: > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > > A more general way to check if MPTCP_PM_ATTR_* exists in 'info' > is to use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_*) instead of > directly reading info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_*] and then checking > if it's NULL. > > So this patch uses GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK() for userspace PM in > mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(), mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(), > mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(), mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit() > and mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(). > > 'Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>' > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> > --- > v4: > - use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in more functions as Matt suggested (thanks) Thank you for the v4! (...) > @@ -309,18 +307,17 @@ void mptcp_pm_remove_addr_entry(struct mptcp_sock *msk, > > int mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) > { > - struct nlattr *id = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID]; > struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *match; > struct mptcp_sock *msk; > + struct nlattr *id; > int err = -EINVAL; > struct sock *sk; > u8 id_val; > > - if (!id) { > - GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required ID"); > + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID)) > return err; > - } > > + id = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID]; > id_val = nla_get_u8(id); Small detail: do we still need the 'struct nlattr *' variables? Here it looks like you could directly have: id_val = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID]); Same in the other functions, no? Up to you. (...) Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.