[PATCH mptcp-next] mptcp: call mp_fail_no_response only when needed

Geliang Tang posted 1 patch 3 years, 3 months ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next tags/patchew/2e7b890b45f548567894a01465ba6ea86dae55e5.1654670172.git.geliang.tang@suse.com
Maintainers: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
There is a newer version of this series
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 +++++++-
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 ++
net/mptcp/subflow.c  | 1 +
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH mptcp-next] mptcp: call mp_fail_no_response only when needed
Posted by Geliang Tang 3 years, 3 months ago
mptcp_mp_fail_no_response shouldn't be invoked on each worker run, it
should be invoked only when MP_FAIL response timeout occurs.

This patch adds a new msk flag MPTCP_FAIL_RESPONSE_EXPECT, set it when
sending MP_FAIL and test it in mptcp_timeout_timer().

Add back MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE flag, set it in mptcp_timeout_timer()
when MP_FAIL response timeout occurs. Test it in mptcp_worker() before
invoking mptcp_mp_fail_no_response().

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/281
Fixes: d9fb797046c5 ("mptcp: Do not traverse the subflow connection list without lock")
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 +++++++-
 net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 ++
 net/mptcp/subflow.c  | 1 +
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index d6aef4b13b8a..cede25e7f2a3 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2185,7 +2185,12 @@ mp_fail_response_expect_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 static void mptcp_timeout_timer(struct timer_list *t)
 {
 	struct sock *sk = from_timer(sk, t, sk_timer);
+	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 
+	bh_lock_sock(sk);
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_FAIL_RESPONSE_EXPECT, &msk->flags))
+		__set_bit(MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE, &msk->flags);
+	bh_unlock_sock(sk);
 	mptcp_schedule_work(sk);
 	sock_put(sk);
 }
@@ -2562,7 +2567,8 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags))
 		__mptcp_retrans(sk);
 
-	mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(msk);
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE, &msk->flags))
+		mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(msk);
 
 unlock:
 	release_sock(sk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index d406b5afbee4..99023a59639b 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@
 #define MPTCP_WORK_EOF		3
 #define MPTCP_FALLBACK_DONE	4
 #define MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW 5
+#define MPTCP_FAIL_RESPONSE_EXPECT	6
+#define MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE		7
 
 /* MPTCP socket release cb flags */
 #define MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING	1
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 8841e8cd9ad8..849dd001bc61 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -1240,6 +1240,7 @@ static bool subflow_check_data_avail(struct sock *ssk)
 					sk_eat_skb(ssk, skb);
 			} else if (!sock_flag(ssk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
 				WRITE_ONCE(subflow->mp_fail_response_expect, true);
+				__set_bit(MPTCP_FAIL_RESPONSE_EXPECT, &msk->flags);
 				sk_reset_timer((struct sock *)msk,
 					       &((struct sock *)msk)->sk_timer,
 					       jiffies + TCP_RTO_MAX);
-- 
2.35.3