From: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com>
MPTCP shares a receive window across subflows and applies it at the
subflow level by adjusting each subflow's rcv_wnd when needed. With
the new TCP tracking of the maximum advertised window sequence,
rcv_mwnd_seq must stay consistent with these subflow-level rcv_wnd
adjustments.
Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com>
---
net/mptcp/options.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
index 43df4293f58bfbd8a8df6bf24b9f15e0f9e238f6..8a1c5698983cff3082d68290626dd8f1e044527f 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/options.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
@@ -1076,6 +1076,7 @@ static void rwin_update(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk,
* resync.
*/
tp->rcv_wnd += mptcp_rcv_wnd - subflow->rcv_wnd_sent;
+ tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq(tp);
subflow->rcv_wnd_sent = mptcp_rcv_wnd;
}
@@ -1338,8 +1339,9 @@ static void mptcp_set_rwin(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct tcphdr *th)
*/
rcv_wnd_new = rcv_wnd_old;
win = rcv_wnd_old - ack_seq;
- tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX);
- new_win = tp->rcv_wnd;
+ new_win = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX);
+ tp->rcv_wnd = new_win;
+ tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq(tp);
/* Make sure we do not exceed the maximum possible
* scaled window.
--
2.53.0
Hi Simon, On 09/03/2026 09:02, Simon Baatz via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> > > MPTCP shares a receive window across subflows and applies it at the > subflow level by adjusting each subflow's rcv_wnd when needed. With > the new TCP tracking of the maximum advertised window sequence, > rcv_mwnd_seq must stay consistent with these subflow-level rcv_wnd > adjustments. Thank you for these modifications! > Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> > --- > net/mptcp/options.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c > index 43df4293f58bfbd8a8df6bf24b9f15e0f9e238f6..8a1c5698983cff3082d68290626dd8f1e044527f 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/options.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c (...) > @@ -1338,8 +1339,9 @@ static void mptcp_set_rwin(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct tcphdr *th) > */ > rcv_wnd_new = rcv_wnd_old; > win = rcv_wnd_old - ack_seq; > - tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); > - new_win = tp->rcv_wnd; > + new_win = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); > + tp->rcv_wnd = new_win; Out of curiosity, why did you change the two lines above? (even if it makes sense, the diff is a bit confusing, and the commit message doesn't mention this :) ) > + tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq(tp); This patch adding this new helper each time rcv_wnd is modified looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> Note: just in case a new version is needed, checkpatch reported an error in patch 4/6 because of a trailing whitespace (+ No space is necessary after a cast in patch 1/6), see: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/22844479818 Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
Hi Matt, On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 07:27:34PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 09/03/2026 09:02, Simon Baatz via B4 Relay wrote: > > From: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> > > > > MPTCP shares a receive window across subflows and applies it at the > > subflow level by adjusting each subflow's rcv_wnd when needed. With > > the new TCP tracking of the maximum advertised window sequence, > > rcv_mwnd_seq must stay consistent with these subflow-level rcv_wnd > > adjustments. > > Thank you for these modifications! > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> > > --- > > net/mptcp/options.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c > > index 43df4293f58bfbd8a8df6bf24b9f15e0f9e238f6..8a1c5698983cff3082d68290626dd8f1e044527f 100644 > > --- a/net/mptcp/options.c > > +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c > > (...) > > > @@ -1338,8 +1339,9 @@ static void mptcp_set_rwin(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct tcphdr *th) > > */ > > rcv_wnd_new = rcv_wnd_old; > > win = rcv_wnd_old - ack_seq; > > - tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); > > - new_win = tp->rcv_wnd; > > + new_win = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); > > + tp->rcv_wnd = new_win; > > Out of curiosity, why did you change the two lines above? > (even if it makes sense, the diff is a bit confusing, and the commit > message doesn't mention this :) ) I wanted to keep tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq() calls close to the respective update sites (same pattern everywhere). In the original form tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq(tp); new_win = tp->rcv_wnd; the ordering suggests that tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq() might modify tp->rcv_wnd. So, I changed it for legibility. Now, I realize it made the diff harder to read. I might have optimized the wrong metric here ;-) > > > + tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq(tp); > > > This patch adding this new helper each time rcv_wnd is modified looks > good to me: > > Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> > > > Note: just in case a new version is needed, checkpatch reported an error > in patch 4/6 because of a trailing whitespace (+ No space is necessary > after a cast in patch 1/6), see: > > https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/22844479818 Thanks. I will change that if there is a v4. -- Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com>
Hi Simon, On 11/03/2026 23:08, Simon Baatz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 07:27:34PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote: >> On 09/03/2026 09:02, Simon Baatz via B4 Relay wrote: >>> From: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> >>> >>> MPTCP shares a receive window across subflows and applies it at the >>> subflow level by adjusting each subflow's rcv_wnd when needed. With >>> the new TCP tracking of the maximum advertised window sequence, >>> rcv_mwnd_seq must stay consistent with these subflow-level rcv_wnd >>> adjustments. >> >> Thank you for these modifications! >> >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> net/mptcp/options.c | 6 ++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c >>> index 43df4293f58bfbd8a8df6bf24b9f15e0f9e238f6..8a1c5698983cff3082d68290626dd8f1e044527f 100644 >>> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c >>> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c >> >> (...) >> >>> @@ -1338,8 +1339,9 @@ static void mptcp_set_rwin(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct tcphdr *th) >>> */ >>> rcv_wnd_new = rcv_wnd_old; >>> win = rcv_wnd_old - ack_seq; >>> - tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); >>> - new_win = tp->rcv_wnd; >>> + new_win = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); >>> + tp->rcv_wnd = new_win; >> >> Out of curiosity, why did you change the two lines above? >> (even if it makes sense, the diff is a bit confusing, and the commit >> message doesn't mention this :) ) > > I wanted to keep tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq() calls close to the > respective update sites (same pattern everywhere). Thanks, I now understand the reason. > In the original form > > tp->rcv_wnd = min_t(u64, win, U32_MAX); > tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq(tp); > new_win = tp->rcv_wnd; > > the ordering suggests that tcp_update_max_rcv_wnd_seq() might modify > tp->rcv_wnd. Note that if tp->rcv_mwnd_seq always needs to be modified when tp->rcv_wnd and/or tp->rcv_wup are modified, maybe a single helper could be called to modify all of them, so it might be less likely to forget about modifying tp->rcv_mwnd_seq as well in the future. But probably it might be unlikely to have new places where tp->rcv_wnd and/or tp->rcv_wup need to be modified like here with MPTCP. So probably fine like that. Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 9:03 AM Simon Baatz via B4 Relay <devnull+gmbnomis.gmail.com@kernel.org> wrote: > > From: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> > > MPTCP shares a receive window across subflows and applies it at the > subflow level by adjusting each subflow's rcv_wnd when needed. With > the new TCP tracking of the maximum advertised window sequence, > rcv_mwnd_seq must stay consistent with these subflow-level rcv_wnd > adjustments. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.