The variable 'ret' was used, but it was not cleared what it was, and
probably led to an issue [1].

Rename it to 'announced' to avoid confusions.

While at it, remove the returned value of the helper: it is only used in
one place, and the returned value is not used.

Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/606 [1]
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c
index 51bcfcec882d..8cbfcf67a9b1 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c
@@ -1045,24 +1045,23 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool mptcp_pm_remove_anno_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
+static void mptcp_pm_remove_anno_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 				      const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr,
 				      bool force)
 {
 	struct mptcp_rm_list list = { .nr = 0 };
-	bool ret;
+	bool announced;
 
 	list.ids[list.nr++] = mptcp_endp_get_local_id(msk, addr);
 
-	ret = mptcp_remove_anno_list_by_saddr(msk, addr);
-	if (ret || force) {
+	announced = mptcp_remove_anno_list_by_saddr(msk, addr);
+	if (announced || force) {
 		spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
-		if (ret)
+		if (announced)
 			msk->pm.add_addr_signaled--;
 		mptcp_pm_remove_addr(msk, &list);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
 	}
-	return ret;
 }
 
 static void __mark_subflow_endp_available(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u8 id)

-- 
2.51.0