1. Patchew
  2. MPTCP
  3. [PATCH mptcp-next 0/7] mptcp: pm: code reorganisation
  4. View patch

[PATCH mptcp-next 6/7] mptcp: pm: worker: split in-kernel and common tasks

Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) posted 7 patches 11 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH mptcp-next 6/7] mptcp: pm: worker: split in-kernel and common tasks
Posted by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) 11 months, 2 weeks ago 
To make it clear what actions are in-kernel PM specific and which ones
are not and done for all PMs, e.g. sending ADD_ADDR and close associated
subflows when a RM_ADDR is received.

Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm.c         | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 21 ++-------------------
 net/mptcp/protocol.h   |  1 +
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index e1ca90701fd92abbf6d8b92d461ddb18d2652391..c17828981dd6400b2ed74dd28a95e21f76ed37b9 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -599,6 +599,31 @@ bool mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(const struct sock *sk,
 #endif
 }
 
+void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+	struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm;
+
+	msk_owned_by_me(msk);
+
+	if (!(pm->status & MPTCP_PM_WORK_MASK))
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
+
+	pr_debug("msk=%p status=%x\n", msk, pm->status);
+	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK)) {
+		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
+		mptcp_pm_addr_send_ack(msk);
+	}
+	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
+		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED);
+		mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv(msk);
+	}
+	__mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(msk);
+
+	spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
+}
+
 void mptcp_pm_destroy(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {
 	mptcp_pm_free_anno_list(msk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 44362b0f7ee4f131482705439eb96c0374177c1d..2a8652886fce6ba9743d0efba576ac57f35a0077 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -924,30 +924,15 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 	mptcp_pm_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, rm_list, MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW);
 }
 
-void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+/* Called under PM lock */
+void __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {
 	struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm;
 
-	msk_owned_by_me(msk);
-
-	if (!(pm->status & MPTCP_PM_WORK_MASK))
-		return;
-
-	spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
-
-	pr_debug("msk=%p status=%x\n", msk, pm->status);
 	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
 		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED);
 		mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(msk);
 	}
-	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK)) {
-		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
-		mptcp_pm_addr_send_ack(msk);
-	}
-	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
-		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED);
-		mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv(msk);
-	}
 	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ESTABLISHED)) {
 		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ESTABLISHED);
 		mptcp_pm_nl_fully_established(msk);
@@ -956,8 +941,6 @@ void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_SUBFLOW_ESTABLISHED);
 		mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_established(msk);
 	}
-
-	spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
 }
 
 static bool address_use_port(struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 93faf203d987100f22e507c7f443d937284881e4..8742527196887598eb242c82f06004107d29ef92 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -1154,6 +1154,7 @@ static inline u8 subflow_get_local_id(const struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflo
 
 void __init mptcp_pm_nl_init(void);
 void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
+void __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_signal_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);

-- 
2.47.1
Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 6/7] mptcp: pm: worker: split in-kernel and common tasks
Posted by Geliang Tang 11 months, 2 weeks ago 
Hi Matt,

On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 21:08 +0100, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> To make it clear what actions are in-kernel PM specific and which
> ones
> are not and done for all PMs, e.g. sending ADD_ADDR and close
> associated
> subflows when a RM_ADDR is received.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
> ---
>  net/mptcp/pm.c         | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 21 ++-------------------
>  net/mptcp/protocol.h   |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> index
> e1ca90701fd92abbf6d8b92d461ddb18d2652391..c17828981dd6400b2ed74dd28a9
> 5e21f76ed37b9 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
> @@ -599,6 +599,31 @@ bool mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(const struct
> sock *sk,
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> +void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> +{
> +	struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm;
> +
> +	msk_owned_by_me(msk);
> +
> +	if (!(pm->status & MPTCP_PM_WORK_MASK))
> +		return;
> +
> +	spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> +
> +	pr_debug("msk=%p status=%x\n", msk, pm->status);
> +	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK)) {
> +		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
> +		mptcp_pm_addr_send_ack(msk);
> +	}
> +	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
> +		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED);
> +		mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv(msk);

CI made the following complaint:

  net/mptcp/pm.c: In function 'mptcp_pm_worker':
  net/mptcp/pm.c:620:17: error: implicit declaration of function
'mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv'; did you mean 'mptcp_pm_rm_addr_received'? [-
Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    620 |                 mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv(msk);
        |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                 mptcp_pm_rm_addr_received

> +	}
> +	__mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(msk);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> +}
> +
>  void mptcp_pm_destroy(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
>  {
>  	mptcp_pm_free_anno_list(msk);
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> index
> 44362b0f7ee4f131482705439eb96c0374177c1d..2a8652886fce6ba9743d0efba57
> 6ac57f35a0077 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> @@ -924,30 +924,15 @@ static void
> mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
>  	mptcp_pm_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, rm_list,
> MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW);
>  }
>  
> -void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> +/* Called under PM lock */
> +void __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
>  {
>  	struct mptcp_pm_data *pm = &msk->pm;
>  
> -	msk_owned_by_me(msk);
> -
> -	if (!(pm->status & MPTCP_PM_WORK_MASK))
> -		return;
> -
> -	spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
> -
> -	pr_debug("msk=%p status=%x\n", msk, pm->status);
>  	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
>  		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED);
>  		mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(msk);
>  	}
> -	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK)) {
> -		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_SEND_ACK);
> -		mptcp_pm_addr_send_ack(msk);
> -	}
> -	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
> -		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_RM_ADDR_RECEIVED);
> -		mptcp_pm_rm_addr_recv(msk);
> -	}
>  	if (pm->status & BIT(MPTCP_PM_ESTABLISHED)) {
>  		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_ESTABLISHED);
>  		mptcp_pm_nl_fully_established(msk);
> @@ -956,8 +941,6 @@ void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
>  		pm->status &= ~BIT(MPTCP_PM_SUBFLOW_ESTABLISHED);
>  		mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_established(msk);
>  	}
> -
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
>  }
>  
>  static bool address_use_port(struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry)
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index
> 93faf203d987100f22e507c7f443d937284881e4..8742527196887598eb242c82f06
> 004107d29ef92 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,7 @@ static inline u8 subflow_get_local_id(const
> struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflo
>  
>  void __init mptcp_pm_nl_init(void);
>  void mptcp_pm_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
> +void __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
>  unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_signal_max(const struct
> mptcp_sock *msk);
>  unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(const struct
> mptcp_sock *msk);
>  unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(const struct mptcp_sock
> *msk);
>

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.