Documentation/netlink/specs/mptcp_pm.yaml | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Two small fixes for the documentation: - The 'server-side' attribute was missing for two events - Attributes were written at the beginning, but without explaining what they were. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> --- Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) (2): netlink: specs: mptcp: add missing 'server-side' attr netlink: specs: mptcp: clearly mention attributes Documentation/netlink/specs/mptcp_pm.yaml | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- base-commit: abd143d0ceebde7465127242f5eeef1e9ea4e253 change-id: 20241213-mptcp-pm-nl-spec-doc-attr-663cc79843cf Best regards, -- Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Hi Matt, Thanks for this set. On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 18:55 +0100, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote: > Two small fixes for the documentation: > > - The 'server-side' attribute was missing for two events > > - Attributes were written at the beginning, but without explaining > what > they were. > > Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> > --- > Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) (2): > netlink: specs: mptcp: add missing 'server-side' attr > netlink: specs: mptcp: clearly mention attributes I think we should swap the positions of these two patches, first move these attributes to the end, then add missing 'server-side' attribute. WDYT? Thanks, -Geliang > > Documentation/netlink/specs/mptcp_pm.yaml | 29 ++++++++++++++++----- > -------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: abd143d0ceebde7465127242f5eeef1e9ea4e253 > change-id: 20241213-mptcp-pm-nl-spec-doc-attr-663cc79843cf > > Best regards,
Hi Geliang, Thank you for the review. On 16/12/2024 10:22, Geliang Tang wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Thanks for this set. > > On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 18:55 +0100, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote: >> Two small fixes for the documentation: >> >> - The 'server-side' attribute was missing for two events >> >> - Attributes were written at the beginning, but without explaining >> what >> they were. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> >> --- >> Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) (2): >> netlink: specs: mptcp: add missing 'server-side' attr >> netlink: specs: mptcp: clearly mention attributes > > I think we should swap the positions of these two patches, first move > these attributes to the end, then add missing 'server-side' attribute. > WDYT? It would make sense if these patches were for net-next, but for fixes modifying the same area, I think it is better to order them by commits they fix. The first one is for 5.19, and the second one is for 6.7. Of course, here, there will be conflicts for the first one with < 6.7 versions. But still, better not to increase the complexity of the backports. Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 11:02 +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Geliang, > > Thank you for the review. > > On 16/12/2024 10:22, Geliang Tang wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > Thanks for this set. > > > > On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 18:55 +0100, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote: > > > Two small fixes for the documentation: > > > > > > - The 'server-side' attribute was missing for two events > > > > > > - Attributes were written at the beginning, but without > > > explaining > > > what > > > they were. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) (2): > > > netlink: specs: mptcp: add missing 'server-side' attr > > > netlink: specs: mptcp: clearly mention attributes > > > > I think we should swap the positions of these two patches, first > > move > > these attributes to the end, then add missing 'server-side' > > attribute. > > WDYT? > > It would make sense if these patches were for net-next, but for fixes > modifying the same area, I think it is better to order them by > commits > they fix. > > The first one is for 5.19, and the second one is for 6.7. Of course, > here, there will be conflicts for the first one with < 6.7 versions. > But > still, better not to increase the complexity of the backports. If so, this set LGTM. I'll add my reviewed-by tag for v2. Thanks, -Geliang > > Cheers, > Matt
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.