On Mon, 2024-07-29 at 11:35 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
>
> On 29/07/2024 03:19, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-07-26 at 16:28 +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> > > This case was not covered, and the wrong ID was set before the
> > > previous
> > > commit.
> > >
> > > The rest is not modified, it is just that it will increase the
> > > code
> > > coverage.
> > >
> > > The right address ID can be verified by looking at the packet
> > > traces.
> > > We
> > > could automate that using Netfilter with some cBPF code for
> > > example,
> > > but
> > > that's always a bit cryptic. Packetdrill seems better fitted for
> > > that.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4f49d63352da ("selftests: mptcp: add fullmesh testcases")
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> > > b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> > > index f609c02c6123..e4ac275366ce 100755
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> > > @@ -3058,6 +3058,7 @@ fullmesh_tests()
> > > if reset "fullmesh test 1x1"; then
> > > pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 1 3
> > > pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 3
> > > + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 flags
> > > subflow,fullmesh
> >
> > nit: add this line behind "pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags
> > signal". Usually, set n1 first and then n2.
>
> It looks like we have a mix, but yes, most of the time we set the
> endpoints for the ns1, then the ns2. I can fix that when applying the
> patches if there are no other big changes needed here.
Sure, please update this when merging it.
>
> > > pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags signal
> > > fullmesh=1 speed=slow \
> > > run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1
> > >
> >
> >
>
> Cheers,
> Matt