[PATCH net-next 0/2] mptcp: add reset reasons in skb in more cases

Jason Xing posted 2 patches 1 month ago
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next tags/patchew/20240405023914.54872-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com
include/net/mptcp.h |  5 +----
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
[PATCH net-next 0/2] mptcp: add reset reasons in skb in more cases
Posted by Jason Xing 1 month ago
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

The first patch only removes the check while the second adds reasons into
some places.

Jason Xing (2):
  mptcp: don't need to check SKB_EXT_MPTCP in mptcp_reset_option()
  mptcp: add reset reason options in some places

 include/net/mptcp.h |  5 +----
 net/mptcp/subflow.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.37.3
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] mptcp: add reset reasons in skb in more cases
Posted by MPTCP CI 1 month ago
Hi Jason,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/8564316916

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/f85bdbdcfadc
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=841648


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)