[v2] mptcp: don't overwrite sock_ops in mptcp_is_tcpsk()

[PATCH mptcp-next v2] mptcp: don't overwrite sock_ops in mptcp_is_tcpsk()

Posted by Davide Caratti 2 years, 2 months ago

Eric Dumazet suggests:

 > The fact that mptcp_is_tcpsk() was able to write over sock->ops was a
 > bit strange to me.
 > mptcp_is_tcpsk() should answer a question, with a read-only argument.

re-factor code to avoid overwriting sock_ops inside that function. Also,
change the helper name to reflect the semantics and to disambiguate from
its dual, sk_is_mptcp(). While at it, collapse mptcp_stream_accept() and
mptcp_accept() into a single function, where fallback / non-fallback are
separated into a single sk_is_mptcp() conditional.

Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/432
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 6956fde61c68d..31822a4fb16e8 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -55,28 +55,16 @@ u64 mptcp_wnd_end(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	return READ_ONCE(msk->wnd_end);
 }
 
-static bool mptcp_is_tcpsk(struct sock *sk)
+static const struct proto_ops *mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops(const struct sock *sk)
 {
-	struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
-
-	if (unlikely(sk->sk_prot == &tcp_prot)) {
-		/* we are being invoked after mptcp_accept() has
-		 * accepted a non-mp-capable flow: sk is a tcp_sk,
-		 * not an mptcp one.
-		 *
-		 * Hand the socket over to tcp so all further socket ops
-		 * bypass mptcp.
-		 */
-		WRITE_ONCE(sock->ops, &inet_stream_ops);
-		return true;
+	if (sk->sk_prot == &tcp_prot)
+		return &inet_stream_ops;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
-	} else if (unlikely(sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)) {
-		WRITE_ONCE(sock->ops, &inet6_stream_ops);
-		return true;
+	else if (sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)
+		return &inet6_stream_ops;
 #endif
-	}
-
-	return false;
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+	return sk->sk_socket->ops;
 }
 
 static int __mptcp_socket_create(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
@@ -3258,44 +3246,6 @@ void mptcp_rcv_space_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk)
 	WRITE_ONCE(msk->wnd_end, msk->snd_nxt + tcp_sk(ssk)->snd_wnd);
 }
 
-static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct sock *ssk, int flags, int *err,
-				 bool kern)
-{
-	struct sock *newsk;
-
-	pr_debug("ssk=%p, listener=%p", ssk, mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk));
-	newsk = inet_csk_accept(ssk, flags, err, kern);
-	if (!newsk)
-		return NULL;
-
-	pr_debug("newsk=%p, subflow is mptcp=%d", newsk, sk_is_mptcp(newsk));
-	if (sk_is_mptcp(newsk)) {
-		struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
-		struct sock *new_mptcp_sock;
-
-		subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(newsk);
-		new_mptcp_sock = subflow->conn;
-
-		/* is_mptcp should be false if subflow->conn is missing, see
-		 * subflow_syn_recv_sock()
-		 */
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_mptcp_sock)) {
-			tcp_sk(newsk)->is_mptcp = 0;
-			goto out;
-		}
-
-		newsk = new_mptcp_sock;
-		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK);
-	} else {
-		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk),
-				MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEFALLBACK);
-	}
-
-out:
-	newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
-	return newsk;
-}
-
 void mptcp_destroy_common(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *tmp;
@@ -3739,7 +3689,6 @@ static struct proto mptcp_prot = {
 	.connect	= mptcp_connect,
 	.disconnect	= mptcp_disconnect,
 	.close		= mptcp_close,
-	.accept		= mptcp_accept,
 	.setsockopt	= mptcp_setsockopt,
 	.getsockopt	= mptcp_getsockopt,
 	.shutdown	= mptcp_shutdown,
@@ -3849,18 +3798,36 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,
 	if (!ssk)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	newsk = mptcp_accept(ssk, flags, &err, kern);
+	pr_debug("ssk=%p, listener=%p", ssk, mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk));
+	newsk = inet_csk_accept(ssk, flags, &err, kern);
 	if (!newsk)
 		return err;
 
-	lock_sock(newsk);
-
-	__inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
-	if (!mptcp_is_tcpsk(newsock->sk)) {
-		struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(newsk);
+	pr_debug("newsk=%p, subflow is mptcp=%d", newsk, sk_is_mptcp(newsk));
+	if (sk_is_mptcp(newsk)) {
 		struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+		struct sock *new_mptcp_sock;
+
+		subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(newsk);
+		new_mptcp_sock = subflow->conn;
+
+		/* is_mptcp should be false if subflow->conn is missing, see
+		 * subflow_syn_recv_sock()
+		 */
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_mptcp_sock)) {
+			tcp_sk(newsk)->is_mptcp = 0;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		newsk = new_mptcp_sock;
+		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK);
+
+		newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
+		lock_sock(newsk);
+		__inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
 
 		set_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &newsock->flags);
+		msk = mptcp_sk(newsk);
 		msk->in_accept_queue = 0;
 
 		/* set ssk->sk_socket of accept()ed flows to mptcp socket.
@@ -3882,6 +3849,21 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,
 			if (unlikely(list_is_singular(&msk->conn_list)))
 				inet_sk_state_store(newsk, TCP_CLOSE);
 		}
+	} else {
+		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk),
+				MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEFALLBACK);
+out:
+		newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
+		lock_sock(newsk);
+		__inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
+		/* we are being invoked after accepting a non-mp-capable
+		 * flow: sk is a tcp_sk, not an mptcp one.
+		 *
+		 * Hand the socket over to tcp so all further socket ops
+		 * bypass mptcp.
+		 */
+		WRITE_ONCE(newsock->sk->sk_socket->ops,
+			   mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops(newsock->sk));
 	}
 	release_sock(newsk);
 
-- 
2.27.0

Re: mptcp: don't overwrite sock_ops in mptcp_is_tcpsk(): Tests Results

Posted by MPTCP CI 2 years, 2 months ago

Hi Davide,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5343194284556288
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5343194284556288/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5061719307845632
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5061719307845632/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6187619214688256
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6187619214688256/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6469094191398912
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6469094191398912/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/d8d6f517221b


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2] mptcp: don't overwrite sock_ops in mptcp_is_tcpsk()

Posted by Paolo Abeni 2 years, 2 months ago

Hi,

On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 10:12 +0100, Davide Caratti wrote:
> Eric Dumazet suggests:
> 
>  > The fact that mptcp_is_tcpsk() was able to write over sock->ops was a
>  > bit strange to me.
>  > mptcp_is_tcpsk() should answer a question, with a read-only argument.
> 
> re-factor code to avoid overwriting sock_ops inside that function. Also,
> change the helper name to reflect the semantics and to disambiguate from
> its dual, sk_is_mptcp(). While at it, collapse mptcp_stream_accept() and
> mptcp_accept() into a single function, where fallback / non-fallback are
> separated into a single sk_is_mptcp() conditional.
> Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/432
> Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>

Nice! this avoids a few conditionals in fast-path!

> ---
>  net/mptcp/protocol.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 6956fde61c68d..31822a4fb16e8 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -55,28 +55,16 @@ u64 mptcp_wnd_end(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
>  	return READ_ONCE(msk->wnd_end);
>  }
>  
> -static bool mptcp_is_tcpsk(struct sock *sk)
> +static const struct proto_ops *mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops(const struct sock *sk)
>  {
> -	struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
> -
> -	if (unlikely(sk->sk_prot == &tcp_prot)) {
> -		/* we are being invoked after mptcp_accept() has
> -		 * accepted a non-mp-capable flow: sk is a tcp_sk,
> -		 * not an mptcp one.
> -		 *
> -		 * Hand the socket over to tcp so all further socket ops
> -		 * bypass mptcp.
> -		 */
> -		WRITE_ONCE(sock->ops, &inet_stream_ops);
> -		return true;
> +	if (sk->sk_prot == &tcp_prot)
> +		return &inet_stream_ops;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
> -	} else if (unlikely(sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)) {
> -		WRITE_ONCE(sock->ops, &inet6_stream_ops);
> -		return true;
> +	else if (sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)
> +		return &inet6_stream_ops;
>  #endif
> -	}
> -
> -	return false;
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +	return sk->sk_socket->ops;

minor nit: you can avoid an additional conditional changing the order
of the above tests:

 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
	if (sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)
		return &inet6_stream_ops;
 #endif

	WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_prot != &tcp_prot);
	return &inet_stream_ops;

Returning &inet_stream_ops for non tcpv4 sockets would likely lead to
later problems, but that warn is there only to protect from unknown/not
foreseen serious bugs. Anything that happens after such warn is really
doomed and even the 'return sk->sk_socket->ops;' present in the current
form of this patch will cause trouble later.
	
>  }
>  
>  static int __mptcp_socket_create(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> @@ -3258,44 +3246,6 @@ void mptcp_rcv_space_init(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk)
>  	WRITE_ONCE(msk->wnd_end, msk->snd_nxt + tcp_sk(ssk)->snd_wnd);
>  }
>  
> -static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct sock *ssk, int flags, int *err,
> -				 bool kern)
> -{
> -	struct sock *newsk;
> -
> -	pr_debug("ssk=%p, listener=%p", ssk, mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk));
> -	newsk = inet_csk_accept(ssk, flags, err, kern);
> -	if (!newsk)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	pr_debug("newsk=%p, subflow is mptcp=%d", newsk, sk_is_mptcp(newsk));
> -	if (sk_is_mptcp(newsk)) {
> -		struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> -		struct sock *new_mptcp_sock;
> -
> -		subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(newsk);
> -		new_mptcp_sock = subflow->conn;
> -
> -		/* is_mptcp should be false if subflow->conn is missing, see
> -		 * subflow_syn_recv_sock()
> -		 */
> -		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_mptcp_sock)) {
> -			tcp_sk(newsk)->is_mptcp = 0;
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> -
> -		newsk = new_mptcp_sock;
> -		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK);
> -	} else {
> -		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk),
> -				MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEFALLBACK);
> -	}
> -
> -out:
> -	newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
> -	return newsk;
> -}
> -
>  void mptcp_destroy_common(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *tmp;
> @@ -3739,7 +3689,6 @@ static struct proto mptcp_prot = {
>  	.connect	= mptcp_connect,
>  	.disconnect	= mptcp_disconnect,
>  	.close		= mptcp_close,
> -	.accept		= mptcp_accept,
>  	.setsockopt	= mptcp_setsockopt,
>  	.getsockopt	= mptcp_getsockopt,
>  	.shutdown	= mptcp_shutdown,
> @@ -3849,18 +3798,36 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,
>  	if (!ssk)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	newsk = mptcp_accept(ssk, flags, &err, kern);
> +	pr_debug("ssk=%p, listener=%p", ssk, mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk));
> +	newsk = inet_csk_accept(ssk, flags, &err, kern);
>  	if (!newsk)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	lock_sock(newsk);
> -
> -	__inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
> -	if (!mptcp_is_tcpsk(newsock->sk)) {
> -		struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(newsk);
> +	pr_debug("newsk=%p, subflow is mptcp=%d", newsk, sk_is_mptcp(newsk));
> +	if (sk_is_mptcp(newsk)) {
>  		struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> +		struct sock *new_mptcp_sock;
> +
> +		subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(newsk);
> +		new_mptcp_sock = subflow->conn;
> +
> +		/* is_mptcp should be false if subflow->conn is missing, see
> +		 * subflow_syn_recv_sock()
> +		 */
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_mptcp_sock)) {
> +			tcp_sk(newsk)->is_mptcp = 0;
> +			goto out;

very minor nit: the label 'out' above could possibly be renamed to
something more descriptive, e.g. 'fallback'. 

> +		}
> +
> +		newsk = new_mptcp_sock;
> +		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK);
> +
> +		newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
> +		lock_sock(newsk);
> +		__inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
>  
>  		set_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &newsock->flags);
> +		msk = mptcp_sk(newsk);
>  		msk->in_accept_queue = 0;
>  
>  		/* set ssk->sk_socket of accept()ed flows to mptcp socket.
> @@ -3882,6 +3849,21 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,
>  			if (unlikely(list_is_singular(&msk->conn_list)))
>  				inet_sk_state_store(newsk, TCP_CLOSE);
>  		}
> +	} else {
> +		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk),
> +				MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEFALLBACK);
> +out:
> +		newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
> +		lock_sock(newsk);
> +		__inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
> +		/* we are being invoked after accepting a non-mp-capable
> +		 * flow: sk is a tcp_sk, not an mptcp one.
> +		 *
> +		 * Hand the socket over to tcp so all further socket ops
> +		 * bypass mptcp.
> +		 */
> +		WRITE_ONCE(newsock->sk->sk_socket->ops,
> +			   mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops(newsock->sk));
>  	}
>  	release_sock(newsk);
>  

Both notes not intended to block the patch, feel free it ignore.

In any case:

Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2] mptcp: don't overwrite sock_ops in mptcp_is_tcpsk()

Posted by Davide Caratti 2 years, 2 months ago

hi Paolo, thanks for reviewing!

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 6:10 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 10:12 +0100, Davide Caratti wrote:
> > Eric Dumazet suggests:

[...]

> > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> > index 6956fde61c68d..31822a4fb16e8 100644
> > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> > @@ -55,28 +55,16 @@ u64 mptcp_wnd_end(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> >       return READ_ONCE(msk->wnd_end);
> >  }
> >
> > -static bool mptcp_is_tcpsk(struct sock *sk)
> > +static const struct proto_ops *mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops(const struct sock *sk)
> >  {
> > -     struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
> > -
> > -     if (unlikely(sk->sk_prot == &tcp_prot)) {
> > -             /* we are being invoked after mptcp_accept() has
> > -              * accepted a non-mp-capable flow: sk is a tcp_sk,
> > -              * not an mptcp one.
> > -              *
> > -              * Hand the socket over to tcp so all further socket ops
> > -              * bypass mptcp.
> > -              */
> > -             WRITE_ONCE(sock->ops, &inet_stream_ops);
> > -             return true;
> > +     if (sk->sk_prot == &tcp_prot)
> > +             return &inet_stream_ops;
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
> > -     } else if (unlikely(sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)) {
> > -             WRITE_ONCE(sock->ops, &inet6_stream_ops);
> > -             return true;
> > +     else if (sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)
> > +             return &inet6_stream_ops;
> >  #endif
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     return false;
> > +     WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > +     return sk->sk_socket->ops;
>
> minor nit: you can avoid an additional conditional changing the order
> of the above tests:

it's not avoided, it's just evaluated inside the WARN_ON_ONCE() :-)

>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
>         if (sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)
>                 return &inet6_stream_ops;
>  #endif
>
>         WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_prot != &tcp_prot);
>         return &inet_stream_ops;
>
> Returning &inet_stream_ops for non tcpv4 sockets would likely lead to
> later problems, but that warn is there only to protect from unknown/not
> foreseen serious bugs. Anything that happens after such warn is really
> doomed and even the 'return sk->sk_socket->ops;' present in the current
> form of this patch will cause trouble later.

I cowardly decided to let the helper return the current value of ->ops
with the WARN_ON(1) line, with the goal of analyzing the splat on a
live system, with the hope of not doing it on a crashed kernel. But
then it didn't happen on a 5 iterations of kselftests + packetdrill,
so... probably we can shorten the function like you suggested, i.e.:

WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_prot != &tcp_prot);
return &inet_stream_ops;

[...]

> > @@ -3849,18 +3798,36 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock,
> >       if (!ssk)
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -     newsk = mptcp_accept(ssk, flags, &err, kern);
> > +     pr_debug("ssk=%p, listener=%p", ssk, mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk));
> > +     newsk = inet_csk_accept(ssk, flags, &err, kern);
> >       if (!newsk)
> >               return err;
> >
> > -     lock_sock(newsk);
> > -
> > -     __inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
> > -     if (!mptcp_is_tcpsk(newsock->sk)) {
> > -             struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(newsk);
> > +     pr_debug("newsk=%p, subflow is mptcp=%d", newsk, sk_is_mptcp(newsk));
> > +     if (sk_is_mptcp(newsk)) {
> >               struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> > +             struct sock *new_mptcp_sock;
> > +
> > +             subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(newsk);
> > +             new_mptcp_sock = subflow->conn;
> > +
> > +             /* is_mptcp should be false if subflow->conn is missing, see
> > +              * subflow_syn_recv_sock()
> > +              */
> > +             if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_mptcp_sock)) {
> > +                     tcp_sk(newsk)->is_mptcp = 0;
> > +                     goto out;
>
> very minor nit: the label 'out' above could possibly be renamed to
> something more descriptive, e.g. 'fallback'.

right, I'll send a v3 in the next hours.

> In any case:
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

thanks a lot!
-- 
davide

Re: mptcp: don't overwrite sock_ops in mptcp_is_tcpsk(): Tests Results

Posted by MPTCP CI 2 years, 2 months ago

Hi Davide,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6556569052119040
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6556569052119040/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5289931656921088
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5289931656921088/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5852881610342400
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5852881610342400/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join):
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4726981703499776
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4726981703499776/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/68ead4ff9b66


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)