We kept getting initial patches from new contributors to remove a
duplicate 'the' (since grammar checking scripts flag it), but submitters
never followed up after code review.

Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
---
 net/mptcp/token.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/token.c b/net/mptcp/token.c
index f52ee7b26aed..65430f314a68 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/token.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/token.c
@@ -287,8 +287,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mptcp_token_get_sock);
  * This function returns the first mptcp connection structure found inside the
  * token container starting from the specified position, or NULL.
  *
- * On successful iteration, the iterator is move to the next position and the
- * the acquires a reference to the returned socket.
+ * On successful iteration, the iterator is moved to the next position and
+ * a reference to the returned socket is acquired.
  */
 struct mptcp_sock *mptcp_token_iter_next(const struct net *net, long *s_slot,
 					 long *s_num)
-- 
2.38.1

Hi Mat,

On 01/11/2022 21:55, Mat Martineau wrote:
> We kept getting initial patches from new contributors to remove a
> duplicate 'the' (since grammar checking scripts flag it), but submitters
> never followed up after code review.

Thank you for the patch!

As discussed at the last meeting, OK to apply as it is:

Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>

Now in our tree (feat. for net-next):

New patches for t/upstream:
- c98a6a04fe47: mptcp: Fix grammar in a comment
- Results: c40114c3c367..5b48361cc96d (export)

Tests are now in progress:

https://cirrus-ci.com/github/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/export/20221103T171741

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net

Hi Mat,

On 01/11/2022 21:55, Mat Martineau wrote:
> We kept getting initial patches from new contributors to remove a
> duplicate 'the' (since grammar checking scripts flag it), but submitters
> never followed up after code review.

Thank you for taking care of this!

This looks good to me of course. Just a small question: do we need to
mention anybody? Maybe not these new contributors as they seem to ignore
the previous requests but maybe Bagas Sanjaya who commented on netdev?

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net

Hi Mat,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_simult_flows 🔴:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6510945403928576
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6510945403928576/summary/summary.txt

- KVM Validation: debug:
  - Success! ✅:
  - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4681358055309312
  - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4681358055309312/summary/summary.txt

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/5f6b7ec4cbf2


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-debug

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (Tessares)