On Sat, 30 Jul 2022, studentxswpy@163.com wrote:
> From: Xie Shaowen <studentxswpy@163.com>
>
> fix follow spelling misktakes:
> regarless ==> regardless
> interaces ==> interfaces
>
> Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Shaowen <studentxswpy@163.com>
Hello Xie Shaowen -
These spelling errors were already fixed in commit d640516a65d8, merged
2022-06-28. Please make sure to work from an up-to-date branch!
Thanks for your patch,
Mat
> ---
> net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 2 +-
> net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> index 7c7395b58944..5bdb559d5242 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ss
> }
> unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
>
> - /* always try to push the pending data regarless of re-injections:
> + /* always try to push the pending data regardless of re-injections:
> * we can possibly use backup subflows now, and subflow selection
> * is cheap under the msk socket lock
> */
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> index af28f3b60389..901c763dcdbb 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
> @@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, struct socket **new_sock)
> /* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master
> * socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed
> * by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the
> - * procfs/diag interaces really show this one belonging to the correct
> + * procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct
> * user.
> */
> SOCK_INODE(sf)->i_ino = SOCK_INODE(sk->sk_socket)->i_ino;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
--
Mat Martineau
Intel