>From 3ad3fae4f2562a11bef8dcdd25b6a7e0b00d4e2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hao Wang <wanghao232@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 15:43:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] client: fix memory leak in client msg
When closing client->waitDispatch in virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveAll
or virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveDone, VIR_FREE() is called to free
call->msg directly, resulting in leak of the memory call->msg->buffer
points to.
Use virNetMessageFree(call->msg) instead of VIR_FREE(call->msg).
Signed-off-by: Hao Wang <wanghao232@huawei.com>
---
src/rpc/virnetclient.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetclient.c b/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
index 441f1502a6..f899493b64 100644
--- a/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
+++ b/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
@@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ static bool virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveDone(virNetClientCallPtr call,
if (call->expectReply)
VIR_WARN("Got a call expecting a reply but without a waiting thread");
virCondDestroy(&call->cond);
- VIR_FREE(call->msg);
+ virNetMessageFree(call->msg);
VIR_FREE(call);
}
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveAll(virNetClientCallPtr call,
VIR_DEBUG("Removing call %p", call);
virCondDestroy(&call->cond);
- VIR_FREE(call->msg);
+ virNetMessageFree(call->msg);
VIR_FREE(call);
return true;
}
--
2.23.0
On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 09:29 +0800, Hao Wang wrote:
> > From 3ad3fae4f2562a11bef8dcdd25b6a7e0b00d4e2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > 2001
> From: Hao Wang <wanghao232@huawei.com>
> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 15:43:30 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] client: fix memory leak in client msg
>
> When closing client->waitDispatch in virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveAll
> or virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveDone, VIR_FREE() is called to free
> call->msg directly, resulting in leak of the memory call->msg->buffer
> points to.
> Use virNetMessageFree(call->msg) instead of VIR_FREE(call->msg).
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Wang <wanghao232@huawei.com>
> ---
> src/rpc/virnetclient.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetclient.c b/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
> index 441f1502a6..f899493b64 100644
> --- a/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
> +++ b/src/rpc/virnetclient.c
> @@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ static bool
> virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveDone(virNetClientCallPtr call,
> if (call->expectReply)
> VIR_WARN("Got a call expecting a reply but without a
> waiting thread");
> virCondDestroy(&call->cond);
> - VIR_FREE(call->msg);
> + virNetMessageFree(call->msg);
> VIR_FREE(call);
> }
>
> @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@
> virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveAll(virNetClientCallPtr call,
>
> VIR_DEBUG("Removing call %p", call);
> virCondDestroy(&call->cond);
> - VIR_FREE(call->msg);
> + virNetMessageFree(call->msg);
> VIR_FREE(call);
> return true;
> }
> --
> 2.23.0
>
>
Reviewed-by: Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma@redhat.com>
On a Thursday in 2020, Hao Wang wrote: >>From 3ad3fae4f2562a11bef8dcdd25b6a7e0b00d4e2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Hao Wang <wanghao232@huawei.com> >Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 15:43:30 +0800 >Subject: [PATCH] client: fix memory leak in client msg > >When closing client->waitDispatch in virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveAll >or virNetClientIOEventLoopRemoveDone, VIR_FREE() is called to free >call->msg directly, resulting in leak of the memory call->msg->buffer >points to. >Use virNetMessageFree(call->msg) instead of VIR_FREE(call->msg). > >Signed-off-by: Hao Wang <wanghao232@huawei.com> >--- > src/rpc/virnetclient.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com> Jano
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.