On 6/20/19 8:51 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Change the example and add a recommendation to use disk target rather
> than path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/formatsnapshot.html.in | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/formatsnapshot.html.in b/docs/formatsnapshot.html.in
> index 1bbbf06205..a19e91b4d5 100644
> --- a/docs/formatsnapshot.html.in
> +++ b/docs/formatsnapshot.html.in
> @@ -140,8 +140,8 @@
> <dd>This sub-element describes the snapshot properties of a
> specific disk. The attribute <code>name</code> is
> mandatory, and must match either the <code><target
> - dev='name'/></code> or an unambiguous <code><source
> - file='name'/></code> of one of
> + dev='name'/></code> (recommended) or an unambiguous
> + <code><source file='name'/></code> of one of
I like it. I also know that for checkpoints, you wanted me to ONLY
accept the disk target name rather than copying the snapshot practice of
also supporting a file name. This gives me a stronger reason to follow
up with that request.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list