[libvirt] [PATCH v3 02/28] virSecurityManagerNewStack: Don't ignore virSecurityStackAddNested retval

Michal Privoznik posted 28 patches 7 years, 5 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[libvirt] [PATCH v3 02/28] virSecurityManagerNewStack: Don't ignore virSecurityStackAddNested retval
Posted by Michal Privoznik 7 years, 5 months ago
The virSecurityStackAddNested() can fail in which case
virSecurityManagerNewStack() should fail too.

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
---
 src/security/security_manager.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/security/security_manager.c b/src/security/security_manager.c
index e1b571ea52..21eb6f7452 100644
--- a/src/security/security_manager.c
+++ b/src/security/security_manager.c
@@ -117,9 +117,13 @@ virSecurityManagerNewStack(virSecurityManagerPtr primary)
     if (!mgr)
         return NULL;
 
-    virSecurityStackAddNested(mgr, primary);
+    if (virSecurityStackAddNested(mgr, primary) < 0)
+        goto error;
 
     return mgr;
+ error:
+    virObjectUnref(mgr);
+    return NULL;
 }
 
 
-- 
2.16.4

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3 02/28] virSecurityManagerNewStack: Don't ignore virSecurityStackAddNested retval
Posted by John Ferlan 7 years, 5 months ago

On 08/27/2018 04:08 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> The virSecurityStackAddNested() can fail in which case
> virSecurityManagerNewStack() should fail too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/security/security_manager.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>

John

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list