Since Fedora 28 (our minimum supported build), ldconfig is called
automatically for us:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets
These changes appear to be implemented for rhel > 7 as well, so only
run ldconfig on rhel7
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
---
libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
index 1497cad3d2..445fddc801 100644
--- a/libvirt.spec.in
+++ b/libvirt.spec.in
@@ -1477,12 +1477,16 @@ exit 0
%post client
+%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
/sbin/ldconfig
+%endif
%systemd_post libvirt-guests.service
%postun client
+%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
/sbin/ldconfig
+%endif
%systemd_postun libvirt-guests.service
%triggerun client -- libvirt < 0.9.4
--
2.21.0
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 15:35 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Since Fedora 28 (our minimum supported build), ldconfig is called
> automatically for us:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets
>
> These changes appear to be implemented for rhel > 7 as well, so only
> run ldconfig on rhel7
s/rhel/RHEL/g
Also we are allowed to say "RHEL 8" now ;)
[...]
> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
> @@ -1477,12 +1477,16 @@ exit 0
>
> %post client
>
> +%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
> /sbin/ldconfig
> +%endif
> %systemd_post libvirt-guests.service
>
> %postun client
>
> +%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
> /sbin/ldconfig
> +%endif
> %systemd_postun libvirt-guests.service
>
> %triggerun client -- libvirt < 0.9.4
IIUC ldconfig should be called after installing the libraries, but
here we're calling it in %post(un) for the client subpackage which
I believe is incorrect. We should fix that too.
Your changes look good otherwise, and it doesn't really matter in
which order the changes are applied, so
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 3/19/19 4:13 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 15:35 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> Since Fedora 28 (our minimum supported build), ldconfig is called
>> automatically for us:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets
>>
>> These changes appear to be implemented for rhel > 7 as well, so only
>> run ldconfig on rhel7
>
> s/rhel/RHEL/g
>
> Also we are allowed to say "RHEL 8" now ;)
>
> [...]
>> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
>> @@ -1477,12 +1477,16 @@ exit 0
>>
>> %post client
>>
>> +%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
>> /sbin/ldconfig
>> +%endif
>> %systemd_post libvirt-guests.service
>>
>> %postun client
>>
>> +%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
>> /sbin/ldconfig
>> +%endif
>> %systemd_postun libvirt-guests.service
>>
>> %triggerun client -- libvirt < 0.9.4
>
> IIUC ldconfig should be called after installing the libraries, but
> here we're calling it in %post(un) for the client subpackage which
> I believe is incorrect. We should fix that too.
>
Calling /sbin/ldconfig from postun is recommended on fedora < 28 (and
thus I presume rhel7), according to:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/
The wiki page in the git commit also indicates that previously packages
would call /sbin/ldconfig on postun too, with the %postun -p
/sbin/ldconfig call
> Your changes look good otherwise, and it doesn't really matter in
> which order the changes are applied, so
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
>
I'll wait until friday to push either incase anyone else has comments
Thanks,
Cole
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 10:49 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 3/19/19 4:13 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 15:35 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > > %post client
> > >
> > > +%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
> > > /sbin/ldconfig
> > > +%endif
> > > %systemd_post libvirt-guests.service
> > >
> > > %postun client
> > >
> > > +%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
> > > /sbin/ldconfig
> > > +%endif
> > > %systemd_postun libvirt-guests.service
> >
> > IIUC ldconfig should be called after installing the libraries, but
> > here we're calling it in %post(un) for the client subpackage which
> > I believe is incorrect. We should fix that too.
>
> Calling /sbin/ldconfig from postun is recommended on fedora < 28 (and
> thus I presume rhel7), according to:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/
>
> The wiki page in the git commit also indicates that previously packages
> would call /sbin/ldconfig on postun too, with the %postun -p
> /sbin/ldconfig call
What I was pointing out is that you're supposed to run ldconfig
after (un)installing libraries: our libraries are shipped in the
libvirt-libs package, but according to the spec file we're running
ldconfig after (un)installing the client binaries instead, and that
seems like a bug to me.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 3/19/19 11:59 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 10:49 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> On 3/19/19 4:13 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 15:35 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>>> %post client
>>>>
>>>> +%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
>>>> /sbin/ldconfig
>>>> +%endif
>>>> %systemd_post libvirt-guests.service
>>>>
>>>> %postun client
>>>>
>>>> +%if 0%{?rhel} == 7
>>>> /sbin/ldconfig
>>>> +%endif
>>>> %systemd_postun libvirt-guests.service
>>>
>>> IIUC ldconfig should be called after installing the libraries, but
>>> here we're calling it in %post(un) for the client subpackage which
>>> I believe is incorrect. We should fix that too.
>>
>> Calling /sbin/ldconfig from postun is recommended on fedora < 28 (and
>> thus I presume rhel7), according to:
>>
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/
>>
>> The wiki page in the git commit also indicates that previously packages
>> would call /sbin/ldconfig on postun too, with the %postun -p
>> /sbin/ldconfig call
>
> What I was pointing out is that you're supposed to run ldconfig
> after (un)installing libraries: our libraries are shipped in the
> libvirt-libs package, but according to the spec file we're running
> ldconfig after (un)installing the client binaries instead, and that
> seems like a bug to me.
>
Ah yes. Probably missed when libvirt-libs was split out of
libvirt-client, commit 70b4f0e719cd
- Cole
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 12:10 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 3/19/19 11:59 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > What I was pointing out is that you're supposed to run ldconfig > > after (un)installing libraries: our libraries are shipped in the > > libvirt-libs package, but according to the spec file we're running > > ldconfig after (un)installing the client binaries instead, and that > > seems like a bug to me. > > Ah yes. Probably missed when libvirt-libs was split out of > libvirt-client, commit 70b4f0e719cd It would certainly look that way. I guess we didn't get bug reports about this because most people install libraries, daemon and clients all at the same time. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.