On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 14:12:34 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> The recent specfile addition broke syntax-check:
> cppi: ../libvirt.spec.in: line 338: not properly indented
> cppi: ../libvirt.spec.in: line 341: not properly indented
> cppi: ../libvirt.spec.in: line 344: not properly indented
>
> Fixes: ac063cb2e76d64a907f96bf0b6a29da4eb484ebc
> Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
> ---
> Push under the 'are we still doing syntax-check?' rule
>
> libvirt.spec.in | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
> index 01f28e62d6..4d75fbecaf 100644
> --- a/libvirt.spec.in
> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
> @@ -335,13 +335,13 @@ BuildRequires: device-mapper-devel
> # For XFS reflink clone support
> BuildRequires: xfsprogs-devel
> %if %{with_storage_rbd}
> -%if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 7
> -BuildRequires: librados-devel
> -BuildRequires: librbd-devel
> -%else
> -BuildRequires: librados2-devel
> -BuildRequires: librbd1-devel
> -%endif
> + %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 7
> + BuildRequires: librados-devel
> + BuildRequires: librbd-devel
I don't think you are supposed to indent these. In fact none other are
indented at all.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list