tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c | 2 +- tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c | 2 +- tools/virt-host-validate-common.c | 18 +++++++++--------- tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Move the word 'Checking' into the appropriate formatting strings and
mark all outstanding ones for translation.
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/637
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
---
tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c | 2 +-
tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c | 2 +-
tools/virt-host-validate-common.c | 18 +++++++++---------
tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c b/tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c
index db1cdd8e2c..adb5ae1717 100644
--- a/tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c
+++ b/tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#include "virt-host-validate-common.h"
#define MODULE_STATUS(mod, err_msg, err_code) \
- virHostMsgCheck("BHYVE", _("for %1$s module"), #mod); \
+ virHostMsgCheck("BHYVE", _("Checking for %1$s module"), #mod); \
if (mod ## _loaded) { \
virHostMsgPass(); \
} else { \
diff --git a/tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c b/tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c
index 9d235ed7ab..3f96423836 100644
--- a/tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c
+++ b/tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int virHostValidateCh(void)
}
if (hasVirtFlag) {
- virHostMsgCheck("CH", "%s", _("for hardware virtualization"));
+ virHostMsgCheck("CH", "%s", _("Checking for hardware virtualization"));
if (hasHwVirt) {
virHostMsgPass();
} else {
diff --git a/tools/virt-host-validate-common.c b/tools/virt-host-validate-common.c
index c8a23e2e99..58d8dbbaa1 100644
--- a/tools/virt-host-validate-common.c
+++ b/tools/virt-host-validate-common.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ void virHostMsgCheck(const char *prefix,
msg = g_strdup_vprintf(format, args);
va_end(args);
- fprintf(stdout, _("%1$6s: Checking %2$-60s: "), prefix, msg);
+ fprintf(stdout, "%1$6s: %2$-60s: ", prefix, msg);
}
static bool virHostMsgWantEscape(void)
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ int virHostValidateDeviceExists(const char *hvname,
virHostValidateLevel level,
const char *hint)
{
- virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "if device %s exists", dev_name);
+ virHostMsgCheck(hvname, _("Checking if device '%1$s' exists"), dev_name);
if (access(dev_name, F_OK) < 0) {
virHostMsgFail(level, "%s", hint);
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int virHostValidateDeviceAccessible(const char *hvname,
virHostValidateLevel level,
const char *hint)
{
- virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "if device %s is accessible", dev_name);
+ virHostMsgCheck(hvname, _("Checking if device '%1$s' is accessible"), dev_name);
if (access(dev_name, R_OK|W_OK) < 0) {
virHostMsgFail(level, "%s", hint);
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ int virHostValidateNamespace(const char *hvname,
{
char nspath[100];
- virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "for namespace %s", ns_name);
+ virHostMsgCheck(hvname, _("Checking for namespace '%1$s'"), ns_name);
g_snprintf(nspath, sizeof(nspath), "/proc/self/ns/%s", ns_name);
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ int virHostValidateLinuxKernel(const char *hvname,
uname(&uts);
- virHostMsgCheck(hvname, _("for Linux >= %1$d.%2$d.%3$d"),
+ virHostMsgCheck(hvname, _("Checking for Linux >= %1$d.%2$d.%3$d"),
((version >> 16) & 0xff),
((version >> 8) & 0xff),
(version & 0xff));
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ int virHostValidateCGroupControllers(const char *hvname,
if (!(controllers & flag))
continue;
- virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "for cgroup '%s' controller support", cg_name);
+ virHostMsgCheck(hvname, _("Checking for cgroup '%1$s' controller support"), cg_name);
if (!virCgroupHasController(group, i)) {
ret = VIR_HOST_VALIDATE_FAILURE(level);
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ int virHostValidateIOMMU(const char *hvname,
struct dirent *dent;
int rc;
- virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "%s", _("for device assignment IOMMU support"));
+ virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "%s", _("Checking for device assignment IOMMU support"));
flags = virHostValidateGetCPUFlags();
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ int virHostValidateIOMMU(const char *hvname,
if (!S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode))
return 0;
- virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "%s", _("if IOMMU is enabled by kernel"));
+ virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "%s", _("Checking if IOMMU is enabled by kernel"));
if (sb.st_nlink <= 2) {
if (bootarg)
virHostMsgFail(level,
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ int virHostValidateSecureGuests(const char *hvname,
else if (flags && virBitmapIsBitSet(flags, VIR_HOST_VALIDATE_CPU_FLAG_SEV))
hasAMDSev = true;
- virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "%s", _("for secure guest support"));
+ virHostMsgCheck(hvname, "%s", _("Checking for secure guest support"));
if (ARCH_IS_S390(arch)) {
if (hasFac158) {
if (!virFileIsDir("/sys/firmware/uv")) {
diff --git a/tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c b/tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c
index 3eeee516d3..b685fa01ba 100644
--- a/tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c
+++ b/tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ int virHostValidateQEMU(void)
}
if (hasVirtFlag) {
- virHostMsgCheck("QEMU", "%s", _("for hardware virtualization"));
+ virHostMsgCheck("QEMU", "%s", _("Checking for hardware virtualization"));
if (hasHwVirt) {
virHostMsgPass();
} else {
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int virHostValidateQEMU(void)
}
if (arch == VIR_ARCH_PPC64 || arch == VIR_ARCH_PPC64LE) {
- virHostMsgCheck("QEMU", "%s", _("for PowerPC KVM module loaded"));
+ virHostMsgCheck("QEMU", "%s", _("Checking for PowerPC KVM module loaded"));
if (!virHostKernelModuleIsLoaded("kvm_hv"))
virHostMsgFail(VIR_HOST_VALIDATE_WARN,
--
2.45.0
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 15:00:26 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > Move the word 'Checking' into the appropriate formatting strings and > mark all outstanding ones for translation. > > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/637 > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> > --- > tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c | 2 +- > tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c | 2 +- > tools/virt-host-validate-common.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > ... > diff --git a/tools/virt-host-validate-common.c b/tools/virt-host-validate-common.c > index c8a23e2e99..58d8dbbaa1 100644 > --- a/tools/virt-host-validate-common.c > +++ b/tools/virt-host-validate-common.c > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ void virHostMsgCheck(const char *prefix, > msg = g_strdup_vprintf(format, args); > va_end(args); > > - fprintf(stdout, _("%1$6s: Checking %2$-60s: "), prefix, msg); > + fprintf(stdout, "%1$6s: %2$-60s: ", prefix, msg); > } > > static bool virHostMsgWantEscape(void) Shouldn't the formatting string change from %2$-60s to %2$-69s since the string will now contain the extra "Checking " prefix? Jirka
On 5/20/24 15:00, Peter Krempa wrote: > Move the word 'Checking' into the appropriate formatting strings and > mark all outstanding ones for translation. > > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/637 > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> > --- > tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c | 2 +- > tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c | 2 +- > tools/virt-host-validate-common.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Michal
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.