On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 12:17:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé via Devel wrote:
>My previous RPM fix was wrong, as sanlock can actually be used with
>libxl too. It is the meson rules that were wrong.
>
I could've foresee this, but both your previous fix and Cole's patch
together made sense... if blindly trusting our meson.build, which, it
turns out, is not only source of the perfect truth O:-)
>Daniel P. Berrangé (2):
> Revert "rpm: disable sanlock when QEMU is disabled"
> locking: use & install test_libvirt_sanlock.sug for both QEMU & LibXL
>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
> libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++--
> src/locking/libvirt_sanlock.aug | 1 +
> src/locking/meson.build | 16 ++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>--
>2.50.1
>