On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:22:52PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 19:42:35 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Switch to the 'notify-reload' service type and send notifications to
> > systemd when reloading configuration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > src/remote/libvirtd.service.in | 2 +-
> > src/remote/remote_daemon.c | 2 ++
> > src/virtd.service.in | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/remote/libvirtd.service.in b/src/remote/libvirtd.service.in
> > index 250b4a6fc3..b0a062e885 100644
> > --- a/src/remote/libvirtd.service.in
> > +++ b/src/remote/libvirtd.service.in
> > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ After=xencommons.service
> > Conflicts=xendomains.service
> >
> > [Service]
> > -Type=notify
> > +Type=notify-reload
>
> ^^^
>
> > Environment=LIBVIRTD_ARGS="--timeout 120"
> > EnvironmentFile=-@initconfdir@/libvirtd
> > ExecStart=@sbindir@/libvirtd $LIBVIRTD_ARGS
> > diff --git a/src/remote/remote_daemon.c b/src/remote/remote_daemon.c
> > index 1d079c7e4b..d44a365000 100644
> > --- a/src/remote/remote_daemon.c
> > +++ b/src/remote/remote_daemon.c
> > @@ -452,9 +452,11 @@ static void daemonReloadHandlerThread(void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
> > virHookCall(VIR_HOOK_DRIVER_DAEMON, "-",
> > VIR_HOOK_DAEMON_OP_RELOAD, SIGHUP, "SIGHUP", NULL, NULL);
> >
> > + virSystemdNotifyReload();
>
> The man page says for 'notify-reload':
>
> • Behavior of notify-reload is similar to notify, with one
> difference: the SIGHUP UNIX process signal is sent to the
> service's main process when the service is asked to reload and
> the manager will wait for a notification about the reload being
> finished.
>
> When initiating the reload process the service is expected to
> reply with a notification message via sd_notify(3) that contains
> the "RELOADING=1" field in combination with "MONOTONIC_USEC="
> set to the current monotonic time (i.e. CLOCK_MONOTONIC in
> clock_gettime(2)) in μs, formatted as decimal string. Once
> reloading is complete another notification message must be sent,
> containing "READY=1". Using this service type and implementing
> this reload protocol is an efficient alternative to providing an
> ExecReload= command for reloading of the service's
> configuration.
>
> So IIUC we need to be also sending MONOTONIC_USEC= in addition to
> RELOADING=1 in order to do the handshake for 'notify-reload' properly.
Opps, yes, well spotted.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|