On 2/26/24 12:36, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:21:47AM +0100, Michal Prívozník wrote:
>> On 2/23/24 18:38, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>>> On 2/22/24 20:04, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
>>>> It looks OK to me, but I'd personally like to see a second ACK on at
>>>> least the API-related changes.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> @Jonathon,
>>> thanks for your review.
>>>
>>> @all,
>>> I would really appreciate it if someone could take a look at the series
>>> before the freeze. Thanks.
>>
>> Indeed, I've marked this for review but then got sidetracked, sorry.
>>
>> Anyway, the code looks good. I just cleaned it up a bit (white spaces,
>> comments, curly braces) - nothing major. Appended Jonathon's Reviewed-by
>> where it was missing and merged (since Jirka wants to freeze right about
>> now).
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
>
> This seems to have introduced a memory leak. See the failures
> reported by the Ubuntu jobs in
>
> https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/pipelines/1190698985
>
> The previous pipeline was successful.
>
Yep, I've noticed that right after push, but was leaving for lunch.
Anyway, here is the fix:
https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/XQA6K7MGGHWT4PQ23IOX4CVM3O5SRUM6/
Michal
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.libvirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.libvirt.org