We should highlight the language bindings that are actively
maintained, keep up with the core library's development pace,
have good API coverage and are relevant to people looking to
integrate libvirt into their projects in $currentyear: based
on these criteria, it makes sense to highlight the Go binding
instead of the Java one.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
---
 docs/index.html.in | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/index.html.in b/docs/index.html.in
index df182c27b6..f44e055174 100644
--- a/docs/index.html.in
+++ b/docs/index.html.in
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
       </p>
       <ul>
         <li>is a toolkit to manage <a href="platforms.html">virtualization platforms</a></li>
-        <li>is accessible from C, Python, Perl, Java and more</li>
+        <li>is accessible from C, Python, Perl, Go and more</li>
         <li>is licensed under open source licenses</li>
         <li>supports <a href="drvqemu.html">KVM</a>,
           <a href="drvqemu.html">QEMU</a>, <a href="drvxen.html">Xen</a>,
-- 
2.26.2

On a Tuesday in 2020, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>We should highlight the language bindings that are actively
>maintained, keep up with the core library's development pace,
>have good API coverage and are relevant to people looking to
>integrate libvirt into their projects in $currentyear: based

Consider %Y from strftime(3) instead of that unreadable bashism.

>on these criteria, it makes sense to highlight the Go binding
>instead of the Java one.
>
>Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
>---
> docs/index.html.in | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>

Jano