gtk-doc-1.30+ does *not* create tree_index.sgml in case the library does
not provide GObjects, which is the case of LibvirtGLib. In previous
versions, though, an empty file would be generated.

This seems to be a regression which hit *a* *lot* of different projects,
all of them having to take the very same approach.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
---
 docs/libvirt-glib/Libvirt-glib-docs.xml | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/libvirt-glib/Libvirt-glib-docs.xml b/docs/libvirt-glib/Libvirt-glib-docs.xml
index f2f3572..505f138 100644
--- a/docs/libvirt-glib/Libvirt-glib-docs.xml
+++ b/docs/libvirt-glib/Libvirt-glib-docs.xml
@@ -16,10 +16,6 @@
     <xi:include href="xml/libvirt-glib-error.xml"/>
     <xi:include href="xml/libvirt-glib-event.xml"/>
   </chapter>
-  <chapter id="object-tree">
-    <title>Object Hierarchy</title>
-    <xi:include href="xml/tree_index.sgml"/>
-  </chapter>
   <index id="api-index-full">
     <title>API Index</title>
     <xi:include href="xml/api-index-full.xml"><xi:fallback /></xi:include>
-- 
2.23.0

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

On 12/3/19 2:04 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> gtk-doc-1.30+ does *not* create tree_index.sgml in case the library does
> not provide GObjects, which is the case of LibvirtGLib. In previous
> versions, though, an empty file would be generated.
> 
> This seems to be a regression which hit *a* *lot* of different projects,
> all of them having to take the very same approach.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
> ---
>   docs/libvirt-glib/Libvirt-glib-docs.xml | 4 ----
>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list