Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@gmail.com>
---
The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get
the appropriate def pointer.
src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755
--- a/src/test/test_driver.c
+++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
@@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain,
return ret;
}
+
+static int
+testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
+ const char *device,
+ virTypedParameterPtr params,
+ int *nparams,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ size_t i;
+ virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
+ virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
+ virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE |
+ VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG |
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1);
+
+ if ((*nparams) == 0) {
+ *nparams = 7;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags)))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device)))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) {
+ switch (i) {
+ case 0: /* inbound.average */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average;
+ break;
+ case 1: /* inbound.peak */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_PEAK,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->peak;
+ break;
+ case 2: /* inbound.burst */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_BURST,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->burst;
+ break;
+ case 3: /* inbound.floor */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_FLOOR,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->floor;
+ break;
+ case 4: /* outbound.average */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_OUT_AVERAGE,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->out)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->out->average;
+ break;
+ case 5: /* outbound.peak */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_OUT_PEAK,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->out)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->out->peak;
+ break;
+ case 6: /* outbound.burst */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_OUT_BURST,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->out)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->out->burst;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (*nparams > 7)
+ *nparams = 7;
+
+ ret = 0;
+ cleanup:
+ virDomainObjEndAPI(&vm);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
static int
testDomainGetState(virDomainPtr domain,
int *state,
@@ -7258,6 +7361,7 @@ static virHypervisorDriver testHypervisorDriver = {
.domainSetMemory = testDomainSetMemory, /* 0.1.4 */
.domainGetHostname = testDomainGetHostname, /* 5.5.0 */
.domainGetInfo = testDomainGetInfo, /* 0.1.1 */
+ .domainGetInterfaceParameters = testDomainGetInterfaceParameters, /* 5.6.0 */
.domainGetState = testDomainGetState, /* 0.9.2 */
.domainGetTime = testDomainGetTime, /* 5.4.0 */
.domainSave = testDomainSave, /* 0.3.2 */
--
2.22.0
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@gmail.com> > --- > > The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get > the appropriate def pointer. > > src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c > index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755 > --- a/src/test/test_driver.c > +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c > @@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain, > return ret; > } > > + > +static int > +testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom, > + const char *device, > + virTypedParameterPtr params, > + int *nparams, > + unsigned int flags) > +{ > + size_t i; > + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL; > + virDomainDefPtr def = NULL; > + virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL; > + int ret = -1; > + > + virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE | > + VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG | > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1); > + > + if ((*nparams) == 0) { > + *nparams = 7; > + return 0; > + } > + > + if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom))) > + return -1; > + > + if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags))) > + goto cleanup; > + > + if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device))) > + goto cleanup; > + > + for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) { > + switch (i) { > + case 0: /* inbound.average */ > + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i], > + VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE, > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0) > + goto cleanup; > + if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in) > + params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average; > + break; Okay, we'll need a macro ^here too. Contrary to what I said in the response to the other GetXParameters, we don't need to make the macro too generic to suit every need, since in ^this particular case, we could also place the 'if' clause in it too. Regards, Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@gmail.com> > > --- > > > > The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get > > the appropriate def pointer. > > > > src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c > > index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755 > > --- a/src/test/test_driver.c > > +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c > > @@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain, > > return ret; > > } > > > > + > > +static int > > +testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom, > > + const char *device, > > + virTypedParameterPtr params, > > + int *nparams, > > + unsigned int flags) > > +{ > > + size_t i; > > + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL; > > + virDomainDefPtr def = NULL; > > + virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL; > > + int ret = -1; > > + > > + virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE | > > + VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG | > > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1); > > + > > + if ((*nparams) == 0) { > > + *nparams = 7; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom))) > > + return -1; > > + > > + if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags))) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > + if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device))) > > + goto cleanup; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) { > > + switch (i) { > > + case 0: /* inbound.average */ > > + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i], > > + VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE, > > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0) > > + goto cleanup; > > + if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in) > > + params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average; > > + break; > > Okay, we'll need a macro ^here too. Contrary to what I said in the > response to the other GetXParameters, we don't need to make the macro > too generic to suit every need, since in ^this particular case, we > could also place the 'if' clause in it too. > > Regards, > Erik Or we could collect the values in the beginning and then use the generic macro I suggested on the other e-mail. What do you think? Ilias -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:46:32AM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > > > > The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get > > > the appropriate def pointer. > > > > > > src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c > > > index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755 > > > --- a/src/test/test_driver.c > > > +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c > > > @@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain, > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > + > > > +static int > > > +testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom, > > > + const char *device, > > > + virTypedParameterPtr params, > > > + int *nparams, > > > + unsigned int flags) > > > +{ > > > + size_t i; > > > + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL; > > > + virDomainDefPtr def = NULL; > > > + virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL; > > > + int ret = -1; > > > + > > > + virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE | > > > + VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG | > > > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1); > > > + > > > + if ((*nparams) == 0) { > > > + *nparams = 7; > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom))) > > > + return -1; > > > + > > > + if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags))) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + > > > + if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device))) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + > > > + for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) { > > > + switch (i) { > > > + case 0: /* inbound.average */ > > > + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i], > > > + VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE, > > > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0) > > > + goto cleanup; > > > + if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in) > > > + params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average; > > > + break; > > > > Okay, we'll need a macro ^here too. Contrary to what I said in the > > response to the other GetXParameters, we don't need to make the macro > > too generic to suit every need, since in ^this particular case, we > > could also place the 'if' clause in it too. > > > > Regards, > > Erik > > Or we could collect the values in the beginning and then use the > generic macro I suggested on the other e-mail. What do you think? Sure, we could do that as well. Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.