Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@gmail.com>
---
The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get
the appropriate def pointer.
src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755
--- a/src/test/test_driver.c
+++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
@@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain,
return ret;
}
+
+static int
+testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
+ const char *device,
+ virTypedParameterPtr params,
+ int *nparams,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ size_t i;
+ virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
+ virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
+ virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE |
+ VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG |
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1);
+
+ if ((*nparams) == 0) {
+ *nparams = 7;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags)))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device)))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) {
+ switch (i) {
+ case 0: /* inbound.average */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average;
+ break;
+ case 1: /* inbound.peak */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_PEAK,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->peak;
+ break;
+ case 2: /* inbound.burst */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_BURST,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->burst;
+ break;
+ case 3: /* inbound.floor */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_FLOOR,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->floor;
+ break;
+ case 4: /* outbound.average */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_OUT_AVERAGE,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->out)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->out->average;
+ break;
+ case 5: /* outbound.peak */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_OUT_PEAK,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->out)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->out->peak;
+ break;
+ case 6: /* outbound.burst */
+ if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
+ VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_OUT_BURST,
+ VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->out)
+ params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->out->burst;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (*nparams > 7)
+ *nparams = 7;
+
+ ret = 0;
+ cleanup:
+ virDomainObjEndAPI(&vm);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
static int
testDomainGetState(virDomainPtr domain,
int *state,
@@ -7258,6 +7361,7 @@ static virHypervisorDriver testHypervisorDriver = {
.domainSetMemory = testDomainSetMemory, /* 0.1.4 */
.domainGetHostname = testDomainGetHostname, /* 5.5.0 */
.domainGetInfo = testDomainGetInfo, /* 0.1.1 */
+ .domainGetInterfaceParameters = testDomainGetInterfaceParameters, /* 5.6.0 */
.domainGetState = testDomainGetState, /* 0.9.2 */
.domainGetTime = testDomainGetTime, /* 5.4.0 */
.domainSave = testDomainSave, /* 0.3.2 */
--
2.22.0
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get
> the appropriate def pointer.
>
> src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
> index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755
> --- a/src/test/test_driver.c
> +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
> @@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +
> +static int
> +testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
> + const char *device,
> + virTypedParameterPtr params,
> + int *nparams,
> + unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + size_t i;
> + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
> + virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
> + virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL;
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE |
> + VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG |
> + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1);
> +
> + if ((*nparams) == 0) {
> + *nparams = 7;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags)))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device)))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) {
> + switch (i) {
> + case 0: /* inbound.average */
> + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
> + VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE,
> + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
> + goto cleanup;
> + if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
> + params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average;
> + break;
Okay, we'll need a macro ^here too. Contrary to what I said in the
response to the other GetXParameters, we don't need to make the macro
too generic to suit every need, since in ^this particular case, we
could also place the 'if' clause in it too.
Regards,
Erik
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get
> > the appropriate def pointer.
> >
> > src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
> > index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755
> > --- a/src/test/test_driver.c
> > +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
> > @@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +static int
> > +testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
> > + const char *device,
> > + virTypedParameterPtr params,
> > + int *nparams,
> > + unsigned int flags)
> > +{
> > + size_t i;
> > + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
> > + virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
> > + virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL;
> > + int ret = -1;
> > +
> > + virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE |
> > + VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG |
> > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1);
> > +
> > + if ((*nparams) == 0) {
> > + *nparams = 7;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags)))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device)))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) {
> > + switch (i) {
> > + case 0: /* inbound.average */
> > + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
> > + VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE,
> > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
> > + goto cleanup;
> > + if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
> > + params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average;
> > + break;
>
> Okay, we'll need a macro ^here too. Contrary to what I said in the
> response to the other GetXParameters, we don't need to make the macro
> too generic to suit every need, since in ^this particular case, we
> could also place the 'if' clause in it too.
>
> Regards,
> Erik
Or we could collect the values in the beginning and then use the
generic macro I suggested on the other e-mail. What do you think?
Ilias
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:46:32AM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get
> > > the appropriate def pointer.
> > >
> > > src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
> > > index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755
> > > --- a/src/test/test_driver.c
> > > +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
> > > @@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain,
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
> > > + const char *device,
> > > + virTypedParameterPtr params,
> > > + int *nparams,
> > > + unsigned int flags)
> > > +{
> > > + size_t i;
> > > + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
> > > + virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
> > > + virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL;
> > > + int ret = -1;
> > > +
> > > + virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE |
> > > + VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG |
> > > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1);
> > > +
> > > + if ((*nparams) == 0) {
> > > + *nparams = 7;
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
> > > + return -1;
> > > +
> > > + if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags)))
> > > + goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > + if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device)))
> > > + goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) {
> > > + switch (i) {
> > > + case 0: /* inbound.average */
> > > + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[i],
> > > + VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE,
> > > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
> > > + goto cleanup;
> > > + if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
> > > + params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average;
> > > + break;
> >
> > Okay, we'll need a macro ^here too. Contrary to what I said in the
> > response to the other GetXParameters, we don't need to make the macro
> > too generic to suit every need, since in ^this particular case, we
> > could also place the 'if' clause in it too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Erik
>
> Or we could collect the values in the beginning and then use the
> generic macro I suggested on the other e-mail. What do you think?
Sure, we could do that as well.
Erik
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.