ping?
Tks,
John
On 1/15/19 8:15 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Although I suppose this could have been an RFC - I just went with
> a v1. I would think at least the first 4 patches are non controversial.
> Beyond that it depends on what is "expected" as output for the
> capabilities output for the storage driver.
>
> John Ferlan (7):
> conf: Extract host XML formatting from virCapabilitiesFormatXML
> conf: Alter virCapabilitiesFormatHostXML to take virCapsHostPtr
> conf: Extract guest XML formatting from virCapabilitiesFormatXML
> conf: Alter virCapabilitiesFormatGuestXML to take virCapsGuestPtr
> conf: Introduce storage pool functions into capabilities
> storage: Process storage pool capabilities
> storage: Add storage backend pool/vol API's to capability output
>
> src/conf/capabilities.c | 449 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> src/conf/capabilities.h | 19 ++
> src/conf/virstorageobj.h | 4 +
> src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
> src/storage/storage_backend.c | 65 +++++
> src/storage/storage_backend.h | 3 +
> src/storage/storage_driver.c | 17 ++
> 7 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-)
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list