[libvirt] [libvirt PATCH v7 4/6] xen_common: Change xenParsePCIList to using virConfGetValueStringList

Fabiano Fidêncio posted 6 patches 7 years, 4 months ago
[libvirt] [libvirt PATCH v7 4/6] xen_common: Change xenParsePCIList to using virConfGetValueStringList
Posted by Fabiano Fidêncio 7 years, 4 months ago
The `if(!list || list->type != VIR_CONF_LIST)` check couldn't be
written in a 100% similar way. Instead, we're just checking whether
`virConfGetValueStringList() <= 0` and creating a new function to:
- return -1 in case virConfGetValueStringList fails either due to some
  allocation failure or when traversing the list;
- resetting the last error and return 0 otherwise;

Taking this approach we can have the behaviour with the new code as
close as possible to the old one.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
---
 src/xenconfig/xen_common.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c b/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
index 7b3e5c3b44..9133998cd7 100644
--- a/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
+++ b/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
@@ -458,22 +458,40 @@ xenParsePCI(char *entry)
     return hostdev;
 }
 
+static int
+xenHandleConfGetValueStringListErrors(int ret, int errorCode)
+{
+    if (ret < 0) {
+        /* It means virConfGetValueStringList() didn't fail because the
+         * cval->type switch fell through - since we're passing
+         * @compatString == false - assumes failures for memory allocation
+         * and VIR_CONF_LIST traversal failure should cause -1 to be
+         * returned to the caller with the error message set. */
+        if (errorCode != VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR)
+            return -1;
+
+        /* If we did fall through the switch, then ignore and clear the
+         * last error. */
+        virResetLastError();
+    }
+    return 0;
+}
 
 static int
 xenParsePCIList(virConfPtr conf, virDomainDefPtr def)
 {
-    virConfValuePtr list = virConfGetValue(conf, "pci");
+    VIR_AUTOPTR(virString) pcis = NULL;
+    virString *entries = NULL;
+    int rc;
 
-    if (!list || list->type != VIR_CONF_LIST)
-        return 0;
+    if ((rc = virConfGetValueStringList(conf, "pci", false, &pcis)) <= 0)
+        return xenHandleConfGetValueStringListErrors(rc, virGetLastErrorCode());
 
-    for (list = list->list; list; list = list->next) {
+    for (entries = pcis; *entries; entries++) {
+        virString entry = *entries;
         virDomainHostdevDefPtr hostdev;
 
-        if ((list->type != VIR_CONF_STRING) || (list->str == NULL))
-            continue;
-
-        if (!(hostdev = xenParsePCI(list->str)))
+        if (!(hostdev = xenParsePCI(entry)))
             return -1;
 
         if (VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT(def->hostdevs, def->nhostdevs, hostdev) < 0) {
-- 
2.17.1

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] [libvirt PATCH v7 4/6] xen_common: Change xenParsePCIList to using virConfGetValueStringList
Posted by John Ferlan 7 years, 4 months ago

On 09/20/2018 09:28 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> The `if(!list || list->type != VIR_CONF_LIST)` check couldn't be
> written in a 100% similar way. Instead, we're just checking whether
> `virConfGetValueStringList() <= 0` and creating a new function to:
> - return -1 in case virConfGetValueStringList fails either due to some
>   allocation failure or when traversing the list;
> - resetting the last error and return 0 otherwise;
> 
> Taking this approach we can have the behaviour with the new code as
> close as possible to the old one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/xenconfig/xen_common.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c b/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> index 7b3e5c3b44..9133998cd7 100644
> --- a/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> +++ b/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> @@ -458,22 +458,40 @@ xenParsePCI(char *entry)
>      return hostdev;
>  }
>  

Things you will get used to eventually... New functions with 2 blank
lines and each argument on one line, although I don't believe you need
to pass errorCode here.

> +static int
> +xenHandleConfGetValueStringListErrors(int ret, int errorCode)
> +{
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        /* It means virConfGetValueStringList() didn't fail because the
> +         * cval->type switch fell through - since we're passing
> +         * @compatString == false - assumes failures for memory allocation
> +         * and VIR_CONF_LIST traversal failure should cause -1 to be
> +         * returned to the caller with the error message set. */
> +        if (errorCode != VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR)
> +            return -1;
> +
> +        /* If we did fall through the switch, then ignore and clear the
> +         * last error. */
> +        virResetLastError();
> +    }
> +    return 0;
> +}
>  
>  static int
>  xenParsePCIList(virConfPtr conf, virDomainDefPtr def)
>  {
> -    virConfValuePtr list = virConfGetValue(conf, "pci");
> +    VIR_AUTOPTR(virString) pcis = NULL;
> +    virString *entries = NULL;
> +    int rc;
>  
> -    if (!list || list->type != VIR_CONF_LIST)
> -        return 0;
> +    if ((rc = virConfGetValueStringList(conf, "pci", false, &pcis)) <= 0)
> +        return xenHandleConfGetValueStringListErrors(rc, virGetLastErrorCode());

No need to pass virGetLastErrorCode - in the 3 uses I see it's not
changing and the called method can make that call.

I can alter before pushing if you're fine with that.

Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>

John


[...]

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] [libvirt PATCH v7 4/6] xen_common: Change xenParsePCIList to using virConfGetValueStringList
Posted by Fabiano Fidêncio 7 years, 4 months ago
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:18 PM, John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 09/20/2018 09:28 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > The `if(!list || list->type != VIR_CONF_LIST)` check couldn't be
> > written in a 100% similar way. Instead, we're just checking whether
> > `virConfGetValueStringList() <= 0` and creating a new function to:
> > - return -1 in case virConfGetValueStringList fails either due to some
> >   allocation failure or when traversing the list;
> > - resetting the last error and return 0 otherwise;
> >
> > Taking this approach we can have the behaviour with the new code as
> > close as possible to the old one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  src/xenconfig/xen_common.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c b/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> > index 7b3e5c3b44..9133998cd7 100644
> > --- a/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> > +++ b/src/xenconfig/xen_common.c
> > @@ -458,22 +458,40 @@ xenParsePCI(char *entry)
> >      return hostdev;
> >  }
> >
>
> Things you will get used to eventually... New functions with 2 blank
> lines and each argument on one line, although I don't believe you need
> to pass errorCode here.
>

Okay, noted!


>
> > +static int
> > +xenHandleConfGetValueStringListErrors(int ret, int errorCode)
> > +{
> > +    if (ret < 0) {
> > +        /* It means virConfGetValueStringList() didn't fail because the
> > +         * cval->type switch fell through - since we're passing
> > +         * @compatString == false - assumes failures for memory
> allocation
> > +         * and VIR_CONF_LIST traversal failure should cause -1 to be
> > +         * returned to the caller with the error message set. */
> > +        if (errorCode != VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR)
> > +            return -1;
> > +
> > +        /* If we did fall through the switch, then ignore and clear the
> > +         * last error. */
> > +        virResetLastError();
> > +    }
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> >
> >  static int
> >  xenParsePCIList(virConfPtr conf, virDomainDefPtr def)
> >  {
> > -    virConfValuePtr list = virConfGetValue(conf, "pci");
> > +    VIR_AUTOPTR(virString) pcis = NULL;
> > +    virString *entries = NULL;
> > +    int rc;
> >
> > -    if (!list || list->type != VIR_CONF_LIST)
> > -        return 0;
> > +    if ((rc = virConfGetValueStringList(conf, "pci", false, &pcis)) <=
> 0)
> > +        return xenHandleConfGetValueStringListErrors(rc,
> virGetLastErrorCode());
>
> No need to pass virGetLastErrorCode - in the 3 uses I see it's not
> changing and the called method can make that call.
>
> I can alter before pushing if you're fine with that.
>

Yes, I'm fine with that. Please, do the changes before pushing! :-)


>
> Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
>
> John
>
>
> [...]
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list