On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 17:11:55 -0300, Julio Faracco wrote:
> Since virConfGetValueBool() can return earlier, the parameter 'value'
> might be not initialised properly inside this method. Another proof:
Yeah, the problem is that if the value is not found, virConfGetValueBool
returns 0 which I did not notice.
I think a better fix will be to execute the condition checking 'tmp' only
when virConfGetValueBool returns 1 as we care only if the user set the
libvir-list mailing list