libvirt-utils.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
---
libvirt-utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libvirt-utils.c b/libvirt-utils.c
index 727397d..0af13dc 100644
--- a/libvirt-utils.c
+++ b/libvirt-utils.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ virReallocN(void *ptrptr,
return -1;
}
tmp = realloc(*(void**)ptrptr, size * count);
- if (!tmp && (size * count)) {
+ if (!tmp && ((size * count) != 0)) {
return -1;
}
*(void**)ptrptr = tmp;
--
2.13.3
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On 08/09/2017 11:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> libvirt-utils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Did you get a compiler that complained?
>
> diff --git a/libvirt-utils.c b/libvirt-utils.c
> index 727397d..0af13dc 100644
> --- a/libvirt-utils.c
> +++ b/libvirt-utils.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ virReallocN(void *ptrptr,
> return -1;
> }
> tmp = realloc(*(void**)ptrptr, size * count);
> - if (!tmp && (size * count)) {
> + if (!tmp && ((size * count) != 0)) {
Do you need the extra (), or will one of these shorter forms also work?
if (!tmp && size * count != 0)
if (!tmp && (size * count) != 0)
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:17:10PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 11:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > libvirt-utils.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Did you get a compiler that complained?
Yes, gcc 7 complains.
> >
> > diff --git a/libvirt-utils.c b/libvirt-utils.c
> > index 727397d..0af13dc 100644
> > --- a/libvirt-utils.c
> > +++ b/libvirt-utils.c
> > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ virReallocN(void *ptrptr,
> > return -1;
> > }
> > tmp = realloc(*(void**)ptrptr, size * count);
> > - if (!tmp && (size * count)) {
> > + if (!tmp && ((size * count) != 0)) {
>
> Do you need the extra (), or will one of these shorter forms also work?
>
> if (!tmp && size * count != 0)
> if (!tmp && (size * count) != 0)
I feel the extra () aid in readability, because you don't have to
try to remember precedence rules which many people don't remember
accurately.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.