On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:32:41AM +0530, Sukrit Bhatnagar wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 15:03, Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 05:36:57PM +0530, Sukrit Bhatnagar wrote:
> > > By making use of GNU C's cleanup attribute handled by the
> > > VIR_AUTOPTR macro for declaring aggregate pointer variables,
> > > majority of the calls to *Free functions can be dropped, which
> > > in turn leads to getting rid of most of our cleanup sections.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sukrit Bhatnagar <skrtbhtngr@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > src/util/virusb.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/util/virusb.c b/src/util/virusb.c
> > > index c14683f..cfeac51 100644
> > > --- a/src/util/virusb.c
> > > +++ b/src/util/virusb.c
> > > @@ -508,8 +508,7 @@ void
> > > virUSBDeviceListDel(virUSBDeviceListPtr list,
> > > virUSBDevicePtr dev)
> > > {
> > > - virUSBDevicePtr ret = virUSBDeviceListSteal(list, dev);
> > > - virUSBDeviceFree(ret);
> > > + VIR_AUTOPTR(virUSBDevice) ret = virUSBDeviceListSteal(list, dev);
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Technically, there's also a virUSBDevicePtr instance in virUSBDeviceSearch that
> > could be converted to VIR_AUTOPTR, but virUSBDeviceListAdd would have to take a
> > double pointer to @dev instead of a single pointer. A bit more background
> > info - the current issue is that virUSBDeviceListAdd calls our
> > VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT helper which does clear the original pointer which we could
> > utilize here, but not while passing a single pointer.
> > Not a deal breaker, though, it's just a nice to have, since you're already
> > working in this area, because I don't suppose we'd make such a change any time
> > soon after your assignment is over.
> >
> > (regardless)
> > Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
>
> There are many such functions:
> virMediatedDeviceListAdd
> virSCSIDeviceListAdd
> virPCIDeviceListAdd
>
> Making those changes would take a while and it is not directly related
> to our cleanup. So, I'll do the necessary after the two cleanup macros
> are used in all files. Is that ok?
Yeah, as I said, it's just "nice-to-have", I understand we are short of time,
so don't bother for now.
Erik
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list