[edk2-devel] [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index

Jeff Brasen via groups.io posted 1 patch 1 year, 8 months ago
Failed in applying to current master (apply log)
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
[edk2-devel] [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index
Posted by Jeff Brasen via groups.io 1 year, 8 months ago
Current code will generate duplicate UID if there are nested clusters

in the topology.



Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>

---

 .../SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c                | 22 ++++++++++++-------

 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)



diff --git a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c

index 3266d8dd98..9295117f1f 100644

--- a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c

+++ b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c

@@ -706,6 +706,8 @@ CreateAmlCluster (

                                  Cannot be CM_NULL_TOKEN.

   @param [in] ParentNode         Parent node to attach the created

                                  node to.

+  @param [in,out] ClusterIndex   Pointer to the current cluster index

+                                 to be used as UID.

 

   @retval EFI_SUCCESS             Success.

   @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER   Invalid parameter.

@@ -718,13 +720,13 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (

   IN        ACPI_CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERATOR                   *Generator,

   IN  CONST EDKII_CONFIGURATION_MANAGER_PROTOCOL  *CONST  CfgMgrProtocol,

   IN        CM_OBJECT_TOKEN                               NodeToken,

-  IN        AML_NODE_HANDLE                               ParentNode

+  IN        AML_NODE_HANDLE                               ParentNode,

+  IN OUT    UINT32                                        *ClusterIndex

   )

 {

   EFI_STATUS              Status;

   UINT32                  Index;

   UINT32                  CpuIndex;

-  UINT32                  ClusterIndex;

   AML_OBJECT_NODE_HANDLE  ClusterNode;

 

   ASSERT (Generator != NULL);

@@ -733,9 +735,9 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (

   ASSERT (CfgMgrProtocol != NULL);

   ASSERT (NodeToken != CM_NULL_TOKEN);

   ASSERT (ParentNode != NULL);

+  ASSERT (ClusterIndex != NULL);

 

-  CpuIndex     = 0;

-  ClusterIndex = 0;

+  CpuIndex = 0;

 

   for (Index = 0; Index < Generator->ProcNodeCount; Index++) {

     // Find the children of the CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO

@@ -790,7 +792,7 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (

                    CfgMgrProtocol,

                    ParentNode,

                    &Generator->ProcNodeList[Index],

-                   ClusterIndex,

+                   *ClusterIndex,

                    &ClusterNode

                    );

         if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

@@ -800,7 +802,7 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (

 

         // Nodes must have a unique name in the ASL namespace.

         // Reset the Cpu index whenever we create a new Cluster.

-        ClusterIndex++;

+        (*ClusterIndex)++;

         CpuIndex = 0;

 

         // Recursively continue creating an AML tree.

@@ -808,7 +810,8 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (

                    Generator,

                    CfgMgrProtocol,

                    Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,

-                   ClusterNode

+                   ClusterNode,

+                   ClusterIndex

                    );

         if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

           ASSERT (0);

@@ -845,6 +848,7 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (

   EFI_STATUS  Status;

   UINT32      Index;

   UINT32      TopLevelProcNodeIndex;

+  UINT32      ClusterIndex;

 

   ASSERT (Generator != NULL);

   ASSERT (Generator->ProcNodeCount != 0);

@@ -853,6 +857,7 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (

   ASSERT (ScopeNode != NULL);

 

   TopLevelProcNodeIndex = MAX_UINT32;

+  ClusterIndex          = 0;

 

   Status = TokenTableInitialize (Generator, Generator->ProcNodeCount);

   if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

@@ -887,7 +892,8 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (

              Generator,

              CfgMgrProtocol,

              Generator->ProcNodeList[TopLevelProcNodeIndex].Token,

-             ScopeNode

+             ScopeNode,

+             &ClusterIndex

              );

   if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {

     ASSERT (0);

-- 

2.25.1





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#92487): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92487
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93067950/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index
Posted by Ard Biesheuvel 1 year, 8 months ago
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 at 22:46, Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> Current code will generate duplicate UID if there are nested clusters
> in the topology.
>

What is a nested cluster?

> Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  .../SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c                | 22 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
> index 3266d8dd98..9295117f1f 100644
> --- a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
> +++ b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,8 @@ CreateAmlCluster (
>                                   Cannot be CM_NULL_TOKEN.
>    @param [in] ParentNode         Parent node to attach the created
>                                   node to.
> +  @param [in,out] ClusterIndex   Pointer to the current cluster index
> +                                 to be used as UID.
>
>    @retval EFI_SUCCESS             Success.
>    @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER   Invalid parameter.
> @@ -718,13 +720,13 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>    IN        ACPI_CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERATOR                   *Generator,
>    IN  CONST EDKII_CONFIGURATION_MANAGER_PROTOCOL  *CONST  CfgMgrProtocol,
>    IN        CM_OBJECT_TOKEN                               NodeToken,
> -  IN        AML_NODE_HANDLE                               ParentNode
> +  IN        AML_NODE_HANDLE                               ParentNode,
> +  IN OUT    UINT32                                        *ClusterIndex
>    )
>  {
>    EFI_STATUS              Status;
>    UINT32                  Index;
>    UINT32                  CpuIndex;
> -  UINT32                  ClusterIndex;
>    AML_OBJECT_NODE_HANDLE  ClusterNode;
>
>    ASSERT (Generator != NULL);
> @@ -733,9 +735,9 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>    ASSERT (CfgMgrProtocol != NULL);
>    ASSERT (NodeToken != CM_NULL_TOKEN);
>    ASSERT (ParentNode != NULL);
> +  ASSERT (ClusterIndex != NULL);
>
> -  CpuIndex     = 0;
> -  ClusterIndex = 0;
> +  CpuIndex = 0;
>
>    for (Index = 0; Index < Generator->ProcNodeCount; Index++) {
>      // Find the children of the CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO
> @@ -790,7 +792,7 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>                     CfgMgrProtocol,
>                     ParentNode,
>                     &Generator->ProcNodeList[Index],
> -                   ClusterIndex,
> +                   *ClusterIndex,
>                     &ClusterNode
>                     );
>          if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> @@ -800,7 +802,7 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>
>          // Nodes must have a unique name in the ASL namespace.
>          // Reset the Cpu index whenever we create a new Cluster.
> -        ClusterIndex++;
> +        (*ClusterIndex)++;
>          CpuIndex = 0;
>
>          // Recursively continue creating an AML tree.
> @@ -808,7 +810,8 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
>                     Generator,
>                     CfgMgrProtocol,
>                     Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,
> -                   ClusterNode
> +                   ClusterNode,
> +                   ClusterIndex
>                     );
>          if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>            ASSERT (0);
> @@ -845,6 +848,7 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
>    EFI_STATUS  Status;
>    UINT32      Index;
>    UINT32      TopLevelProcNodeIndex;
> +  UINT32      ClusterIndex;
>
>    ASSERT (Generator != NULL);
>    ASSERT (Generator->ProcNodeCount != 0);
> @@ -853,6 +857,7 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
>    ASSERT (ScopeNode != NULL);
>
>    TopLevelProcNodeIndex = MAX_UINT32;
> +  ClusterIndex          = 0;
>
>    Status = TokenTableInitialize (Generator, Generator->ProcNodeCount);
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> @@ -887,7 +892,8 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
>               Generator,
>               CfgMgrProtocol,
>               Generator->ProcNodeList[TopLevelProcNodeIndex].Token,
> -             ScopeNode
> +             ScopeNode,
> +             &ClusterIndex
>               );
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>      ASSERT (0);
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#92502): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92502
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93067950/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index
Posted by Jeff Brasen via groups.io 1 year, 8 months ago

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 1:01 AM
> To: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; quic_llindhol@quicinc.com;
> ardb+tianocore@kernel.org; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> Alexei.Fedorov@arm.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 at 22:46, Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > Current code will generate duplicate UID if there are nested clusters
> > in the topology.
> >
> 
> What is a nested cluster?
> 

Better terminology would be nested processor containers, in our case we have socket/cluster/cpu. I'll update the commit message. Should I also change CreateAmlCluster to CreateAmlProcessorContainer?

> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  .../SsdtCpuTopologyGenerator.c                | 22 ++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> >
> a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCp
> uT
> > opologyGenerator.c
> >
> b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCp
> uT
> > opologyGenerator.c
> > index 3266d8dd98..9295117f1f 100644
> > ---
> >
> a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/SsdtCp
> uT
> > opologyGenerator.c
> > +++
> b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtCpuTopologyLibArm/Ssdt
> > +++ CpuTopologyGenerator.c
> > @@ -706,6 +706,8 @@ CreateAmlCluster (
> >                                   Cannot be CM_NULL_TOKEN.
> >    @param [in] ParentNode         Parent node to attach the created
> >                                   node to.
> > +  @param [in,out] ClusterIndex   Pointer to the current cluster index
> > +                                 to be used as UID.
> >
> >    @retval EFI_SUCCESS             Success.
> >    @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER   Invalid parameter.
> > @@ -718,13 +720,13 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> >    IN        ACPI_CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERATOR                   *Generator,
> >    IN  CONST EDKII_CONFIGURATION_MANAGER_PROTOCOL  *CONST
> CfgMgrProtocol,
> >    IN        CM_OBJECT_TOKEN                               NodeToken,
> > -  IN        AML_NODE_HANDLE                               ParentNode
> > +  IN        AML_NODE_HANDLE                               ParentNode,
> > +  IN OUT    UINT32                                        *ClusterIndex
> >    )
> >  {
> >    EFI_STATUS              Status;
> >    UINT32                  Index;
> >    UINT32                  CpuIndex;
> > -  UINT32                  ClusterIndex;
> >    AML_OBJECT_NODE_HANDLE  ClusterNode;
> >
> >    ASSERT (Generator != NULL);
> > @@ -733,9 +735,9 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> >    ASSERT (CfgMgrProtocol != NULL);
> >    ASSERT (NodeToken != CM_NULL_TOKEN);
> >    ASSERT (ParentNode != NULL);
> > +  ASSERT (ClusterIndex != NULL);
> >
> > -  CpuIndex     = 0;
> > -  ClusterIndex = 0;
> > +  CpuIndex = 0;
> >
> >    for (Index = 0; Index < Generator->ProcNodeCount; Index++) {
> >      // Find the children of the CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO @@ -
> 790,7
> > +792,7 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> >                     CfgMgrProtocol,
> >                     ParentNode,
> >                     &Generator->ProcNodeList[Index],
> > -                   ClusterIndex,
> > +                   *ClusterIndex,
> >                     &ClusterNode
> >                     );
> >          if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > @@ -800,7 +802,7 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> >
> >          // Nodes must have a unique name in the ASL namespace.
> >          // Reset the Cpu index whenever we create a new Cluster.
> > -        ClusterIndex++;
> > +        (*ClusterIndex)++;
> >          CpuIndex = 0;
> >
> >          // Recursively continue creating an AML tree.
> > @@ -808,7 +810,8 @@ CreateAmlCpuTopologyTree (
> >                     Generator,
> >                     CfgMgrProtocol,
> >                     Generator->ProcNodeList[Index].Token,
> > -                   ClusterNode
> > +                   ClusterNode,
> > +                   ClusterIndex
> >                     );
> >          if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> >            ASSERT (0);
> > @@ -845,6 +848,7 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
> >    EFI_STATUS  Status;
> >    UINT32      Index;
> >    UINT32      TopLevelProcNodeIndex;
> > +  UINT32      ClusterIndex;
> >
> >    ASSERT (Generator != NULL);
> >    ASSERT (Generator->ProcNodeCount != 0); @@ -853,6 +857,7 @@
> > CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
> >    ASSERT (ScopeNode != NULL);
> >
> >    TopLevelProcNodeIndex = MAX_UINT32;
> > +  ClusterIndex          = 0;
> >
> >    Status = TokenTableInitialize (Generator, Generator->ProcNodeCount);
> >    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > @@ -887,7 +892,8 @@ CreateTopologyFromProcHierarchy (
> >               Generator,
> >               CfgMgrProtocol,
> >               Generator->ProcNodeList[TopLevelProcNodeIndex].Token,
> > -             ScopeNode
> > +             ScopeNode,
> > +             &ClusterIndex
> >               );
> >    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> >      ASSERT (0);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#92526): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92526
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93067950/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index
Posted by Ard Biesheuvel 1 year, 8 months ago
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 18:14, Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 1:01 AM
> > To: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; quic_llindhol@quicinc.com;
> > ardb+tianocore@kernel.org; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> > Alexei.Fedorov@arm.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index
> >
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 at 22:46, Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Current code will generate duplicate UID if there are nested clusters
> > > in the topology.
> > >
> >
> > What is a nested cluster?
> >
>
> Better terminology would be nested processor containers, in our case we have socket/cluster/cpu. I'll update the commit message. Should I also change CreateAmlCluster to CreateAmlProcessorContainer?
>

Works for me, but Sami has the final call as he maintains this package.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#92546): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92546
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93067950/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index
Posted by Sami Mujawar 1 year, 8 months ago
Hi Jeff,

Thank you for this patch.

On 18/08/2022 11:22 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 18:14, Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 1:01 AM
>>> To: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
>>> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; quic_llindhol@quicinc.com;
>>> ardb+tianocore@kernel.org; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
>>> Alexei.Fedorov@arm.com
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] DynamicTablesPkg: Correct cluster index
>>>
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 at 22:46, Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>> Current code will generate duplicate UID if there are nested clusters
>>>> in the topology.
>>>>
>>> What is a nested cluster?
>>>
>> Better terminology would be nested processor containers, in our case we have socket/cluster/cpu. I'll update the commit message. Should I also change CreateAmlCluster to CreateAmlProcessorContainer?
>>
> Works for me, but Sami has the final call as he maintains this package.

[SAMI] CreateAmlProcessorContainer is more appropriate. Please change 
CreateAmlCluster to CreateAmlProcessorContainer.

Regards,

Sami Mujawar



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#92550): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/92550
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93067950/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-