In previous code logic, when splitting a leaf parent entry to
smaller granularity child page table, if the parent entry
Attribute&Mask(without PageTableBaseAddress field) is equal to the
input attribute&mask(without PageTableBaseAddress field), the split
process won't happen. This may lead to failure in non-1:1 mapping.
For example, there is a page table in which [0, 1G] is mapped(Lv4[0]
,Lv3[0,0], a non-leaf level4 entry and a leaf level3 entry). And we
want to remap [0, 2M] linear address range to [1G, 1G + 2M] with the
same attibute. The expected behaviour should be: split Lv3[0,0]
entry into 512 level2 entries and remap the first level2 entry to
cover [0, 2M]. But the split won't happen in previous code since
PageTableBaseAddress of input Attribute is not checked.
So, when checking if a leaf parent entry needs to be splitted, we
should also check if PageTableBaseAddress calculated by parent entry
is equal to the value caculated by input attribute.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c
index 127b65183f..b94ef07c56 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ PageTableLibMapInLevel (
IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE ChildMask;
IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE CurrentMask;
IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE LocalParentAttribute;
+ UINT64 PhysicalAddrInEntry;
+ UINT64 PhysicalAddrInAttr;
ASSERT (Level != 0);
ASSERT ((Attribute != NULL) && (Mask != NULL));
@@ -341,7 +343,15 @@ PageTableLibMapInLevel (
// This function is called when the memory length is less than the region length of the parent level.
// No need to split the page when the attributes equal.
//
- return RETURN_SUCCESS;
+ if (Mask->Bits.PageTableBaseAddress == 0) {
+ return RETURN_SUCCESS;
+ }
+
+ PhysicalAddrInEntry = IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE_PAGE_TABLE_BASE_ADDRESS (&PleBAttribute) + MultU64x32 (RegionLength, (UINT32)PagingEntryIndex);
+ PhysicalAddrInAttr = (IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE_PAGE_TABLE_BASE_ADDRESS (Attribute) + Offset) & (~RegionMask);
+ if (PhysicalAddrInEntry == PhysicalAddrInAttr) {
+ return RETURN_SUCCESS;
+ }
}
ASSERT (Buffer == NULL || *BufferSize >= SIZE_4KB);
--
2.31.1.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#101762): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/101762
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97819604/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tan, Dun <dun.tan@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 4:52 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Kumar,
> Rahul R <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Subject: [Patch V6 04/22] UefiCpuPkg/CpuPageTableLib: Fix the non-1:1
> mapping issue
>
> In previous code logic, when splitting a leaf parent entry to
> smaller granularity child page table, if the parent entry
> Attribute&Mask(without PageTableBaseAddress field) is equal to the
> input attribute&mask(without PageTableBaseAddress field), the split
> process won't happen. This may lead to failure in non-1:1 mapping.
>
> For example, there is a page table in which [0, 1G] is mapped(Lv4[0]
> ,Lv3[0,0], a non-leaf level4 entry and a leaf level3 entry). And we
> want to remap [0, 2M] linear address range to [1G, 1G + 2M] with the
> same attibute. The expected behaviour should be: split Lv3[0,0]
> entry into 512 level2 entries and remap the first level2 entry to
> cover [0, 2M]. But the split won't happen in previous code since
> PageTableBaseAddress of input Attribute is not checked.
>
> So, when checking if a leaf parent entry needs to be splitted, we
> should also check if PageTableBaseAddress calculated by parent entry
> is equal to the value caculated by input attribute.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c | 12
> +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c
> index 127b65183f..b94ef07c56 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuPageTableLib/CpuPageTableMap.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ PageTableLibMapInLevel (
> IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE ChildMask;
> IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE CurrentMask;
> IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE LocalParentAttribute;
> + UINT64 PhysicalAddrInEntry;
> + UINT64 PhysicalAddrInAttr;
>
> ASSERT (Level != 0);
> ASSERT ((Attribute != NULL) && (Mask != NULL));
> @@ -341,7 +343,15 @@ PageTableLibMapInLevel (
> // This function is called when the memory length is less than the region
> length of the parent level.
> // No need to split the page when the attributes equal.
> //
> - return RETURN_SUCCESS;
> + if (Mask->Bits.PageTableBaseAddress == 0) {
> + return RETURN_SUCCESS;
> + }
> +
> + PhysicalAddrInEntry =
> IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE_PAGE_TABLE_BASE_ADDRESS (&PleBAttribute) +
> MultU64x32 (RegionLength, (UINT32)PagingEntryIndex);
> + PhysicalAddrInAttr =
> (IA32_MAP_ATTRIBUTE_PAGE_TABLE_BASE_ADDRESS (Attribute) + Offset)
> & (~RegionMask);
> + if (PhysicalAddrInEntry == PhysicalAddrInAttr) {
> + return RETURN_SUCCESS;
> + }
> }
>
> ASSERT (Buffer == NULL || *BufferSize >= SIZE_4KB);
> --
> 2.31.1.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#101786): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/101786
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97819604/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/3901457/1787277/102458076/xyzzy [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.