CPUID leaf 0xD sub-leafs 0x0 and 0x1 contain cumulative sizes for the
enabled XSave areas. Those sizes are calculated by tallying up all the
other sub-leafs that contain per-area size information for XSave areas
that are currently enabled in XCr0/XSS. The current check has the logic
inverted. Fix that.
This doesn't seem to cause problems currently, but could in the future
if OVMF made more extensive use of XSave areas. It was noticed while
implementing SNP-related tests for KVM Unit Tests, which re-uses the
OVMF #VC handler in some cases.
Reported-by: Pavan Kumar Paluri <papaluri@amd.com>
Cc: Pavan Kumar Paluri <papaluri@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
---
OvmfPkg/Library/CcExitLib/CcExitVcHandler.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/CcExitLib/CcExitVcHandler.c b/OvmfPkg/Library/CcExitLib/CcExitVcHandler.c
index 7fe11c5324..94f0c4872c 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/Library/CcExitLib/CcExitVcHandler.c
+++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/CcExitLib/CcExitVcHandler.c
@@ -1145,9 +1145,7 @@ GetCpuidXSaveSize (
for (Idx = 0; Idx < CpuidInfo->Count; Idx++) {
SEV_SNP_CPUID_FUNCTION *CpuidFn = &CpuidInfo->function[Idx];
- if (!((CpuidFn->EaxIn == 0xD) &&
- ((CpuidFn->EcxIn == 0) || (CpuidFn->EcxIn == 1))))
- {
+ if (!((CpuidFn->EaxIn == 0xD) && (CpuidFn->EcxIn > 1))) {
continue;
}
--
2.25.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#101247): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/101247
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97638507/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-