Hi Michael,
Thank you for this fix.
These changes look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
On 25/08/2022 04:48 am, mikuback@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
>
> Cc: Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexei Fedorov <Alexei.Fedorov@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
> ---
> DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiPpttLibArm/PpttGenerator.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiPpttLibArm/PpttGenerator.c b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiPpttLibArm/PpttGenerator.c
> index 59001378c4e0..78fa63ff47e5 100644
> --- a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiPpttLibArm/PpttGenerator.c
> +++ b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiPpttLibArm/PpttGenerator.c
> @@ -436,7 +436,6 @@ IsGicCTokenEqual (
> "the same GICC Info object. ACPI Processor IDs are not unique. " \
> "GicCToken = %p.\n",
> Index1,
> - IndexedObject1->Token,
> Index2,
> ProcNode1->GicCToken
> ));
> @@ -566,7 +565,7 @@ AddProcHierarchyNodes (
> DEBUG ((
> DEBUG_ERROR,
> "ERROR: PPTT: Failed to get parent processor hierarchy node " \
> - "reference. Token = %p, Status = %r\n",
> + "reference. ParentToken = %p. ChildToken = %p. Status = %r\n",
> ProcInfoNode->ParentToken,
> ProcInfoNode->Token,
> Status
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#93036): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/93036
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93242252/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-