REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2683
This patch used to fix a ASSERT because AP can't find the CpuMpData.
When AP been waked up through Init-Sipi-Sipi, the IDT should
been restore to preallcated buffer to make it can get the
CpuMpData through IDT base address.
Not when CpuMpData->InitFlag is ApInitReconfig or ApInitConfig,
AP will be wake up through Init-Sipi-Sipi. Current code already
has logic to handle ApInitConfig, but miss the handler for
ApInitReconfig. This patch fixes this gap.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Chandana Kumar <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index 64a4c3546e..ac7f92fd48 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -664,8 +664,9 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
BistData = *(UINT32 *) ((UINTN) ApTopOfStack - sizeof (UINTN));
//
// CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized based on BSP environment,
- // to initialize AP in InitConfig path.
- // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters points to a different IDT shared by all APs.
+ // to initialize AP in InitConfig/ApInitReconfig path.
+ // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters points to a
+ // different IDT shared by all APs.
//
RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters, FALSE);
InitializeApData (CpuMpData, ProcessorNumber, BistData, ApTopOfStack);
@@ -673,6 +674,16 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
InterlockedDecrement ((UINT32 *) &CpuMpData->MpCpuExchangeInfo->NumApsExecuting);
} else {
+ if ((CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig) && (CpuMpData->ApLoopMode != ApInHltLoop)) {
+ //
+ // CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized based on BSP environment,
+ // to initialize AP in InitConfig/ApInitReconfig path.
+ // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters points to a
+ // different IDT shared by all APs.
+ //
+ RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters, FALSE);
+ }
+
//
// Execute AP function if AP is ready
//
--
2.23.0.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#57773): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57773
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/73187416/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Please check my comments in below.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 9:35 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar,
> Chandana C <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs.
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2683
>
>
>
> This patch used to fix a ASSERT because AP can't find the CpuMpData.
1. This patch fixes an assertion because AP can't find the CpuMpData.
>
>
> When AP been waked up through Init-Sipi-Sipi, the IDT should
> been restore to preallcated buffer to make it can get the
> CpuMpData through IDT base address.
> Not when CpuMpData->InitFlag is ApInitReconfig or ApInitConfig,
> AP will be wake up through Init-Sipi-Sipi. Current code already
> has logic to handle ApInitConfig, but miss the handler for
> ApInitReconfig. This patch fixes this gap.
2. When AP is waken up through Init-Sipi-Sipi, AP's IDT should
be restored to pre-allocated buffer so AP can get the CpuMpData
through the IDT base address.
Current code already has logic to handle this when CpuMpData->
InitFlag is ApInitConfig but misses the logic
when CpuMpData->InitFlag is ApInitReconfig.
This patch fixes this gap.
>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Chandana Kumar <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> index 64a4c3546e..ac7f92fd48 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> @@ -664,8 +664,9 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
> BistData = *(UINT32 *) ((UINTN) ApTopOfStack - sizeof (UINTN));
>
> //
>
> // CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized based on BSP
> environment,
>
> - // to initialize AP in InitConfig path.
>
> - // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters
> points to a different IDT shared by all APs.
>
> + // to initialize AP in InitConfig/ApInitReconfig path.
>
> + // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters
> points to a
>
> + // different IDT shared by all APs.
>
> //
>
> RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters,
> FALSE);
>
> InitializeApData (CpuMpData, ProcessorNumber, BistData,
> ApTopOfStack);
>
> @@ -673,6 +674,16 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
>
>
> InterlockedDecrement ((UINT32 *) &CpuMpData->MpCpuExchangeInfo-
> >NumApsExecuting);
>
> } else {
>
> + if ((CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig) && (CpuMpData-
> >ApLoopMode != ApInHltLoop)) {
>
> + //
>
> + // CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized based on
> BSP environment,
>
> + // to initialize AP in InitConfig/ApInitReconfig path.
3.
Initialize AP volatile registers in ApInitReconfig path.
ApInitReconfig happens when:
1. AP is re-enabled after it's disabled, in either PEI or DXE phase.
2. AP is initialized in DXE phase.
>
> + // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData-
> >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters points to a
>
> + // different IDT shared by all APs.
>
> + //
>
> + RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters,
> FALSE);
4. Is it possible to combine this function call with the restoration code below?
if (CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig) {
//
// ApInitReconfig happens when:
// 1. AP is re-enabled after it's disabled, in either PEI or DXE phase.
// 2. AP is initialized in DXE phase.
// In either case, use the volatile registers value derived from BSP.
// NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters points to a
// different IDT shared by all APs.
//
RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters, FALSE);
} else {
if (CpuMpData->ApLoopMode == ApInHltLoop) {
//
// Restore AP's volatile registers saved before AP is halted
//
RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].VolatileRegisters, TRUE);
} else {
//
// The CPU driver might not flush TLB for APs on spot after updating
// page attributes. AP in mwait loop mode needs to take care of it when
// woken up.
//
CpuFlushTlb ();
}
}
>
> + }
>
> +
>
> //
>
> // Execute AP function if AP is ready
>
> //
>
> --
> 2.23.0.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#57782): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57782
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/73187416/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:54 PM
> To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Kumar, Chandana C
> <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs.
>
> Please check my comments in below.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 9:35 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>;
> > Kumar, Chandana C <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs.
> >
> > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2683
> >
> >
> >
> > This patch used to fix a ASSERT because AP can't find the CpuMpData.
>
> 1. This patch fixes an assertion because AP can't find the CpuMpData.
>
> >
> >
> > When AP been waked up through Init-Sipi-Sipi, the IDT should been
> > restore to preallcated buffer to make it can get the CpuMpData through
> > IDT base address.
> > Not when CpuMpData->InitFlag is ApInitReconfig or ApInitConfig, AP
> > will be wake up through Init-Sipi-Sipi. Current code already has logic
> > to handle ApInitConfig, but miss the handler for ApInitReconfig. This
> > patch fixes this gap.
>
> 2. When AP is waken up through Init-Sipi-Sipi, AP's IDT should be restored to
> pre-allocated buffer so AP can get the CpuMpData through the IDT base
> address.
> Current code already has logic to handle this when CpuMpData-> InitFlag is
> ApInitConfig but misses the logic when CpuMpData->InitFlag is
> ApInitReconfig.
> This patch fixes this gap.
>
>
>
> >
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Chandana Kumar <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > ---
> > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > index 64a4c3546e..ac7f92fd48 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
> > @@ -664,8 +664,9 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
> > BistData = *(UINT32 *) ((UINTN) ApTopOfStack - sizeof (UINTN));
> >
> > //
> >
> > // CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized based on BSP
> > environment,
> >
> > - // to initialize AP in InitConfig path.
> >
> > - // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData-
> >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters
> > points to a different IDT shared by all APs.
> >
> > + // to initialize AP in InitConfig/ApInitReconfig path.
> >
> > + // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData-
> >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters
> > points to a
> >
> > + // different IDT shared by all APs.
> >
> > //
> >
> > RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters,
> > FALSE);
> >
> > InitializeApData (CpuMpData, ProcessorNumber, BistData,
> > ApTopOfStack);
> >
> > @@ -673,6 +674,16 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
> >
> >
> > InterlockedDecrement ((UINT32 *) &CpuMpData-
> >MpCpuExchangeInfo-
> > >NumApsExecuting);
> >
> > } else {
> >
> > + if ((CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig) && (CpuMpData-
> > >ApLoopMode != ApInHltLoop)) {
> >
> > + //
> >
> > + // CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized based on
> > BSP environment,
> >
> > + // to initialize AP in InitConfig/ApInitReconfig path.
>
> 3.
> Initialize AP volatile registers in ApInitReconfig path.
> ApInitReconfig happens when:
> 1. AP is re-enabled after it's disabled, in either PEI or DXE phase.
> 2. AP is initialized in DXE phase.
>
> >
> > + // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData-
> > >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters points to a
> >
> > + // different IDT shared by all APs.
> >
> > + //
> >
> > + RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData-
> >CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters,
> > FALSE);
>
> 4. Is it possible to combine this function call with the restoration code below?
>
New logic changes code flow when CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig. In original flow, the code does RestoreVolatileRegisters and CpuFlushTlb, but new code only does CpuFlushTlb.
Is CpuFlushTlb not needs if wake up through Init-Sipi-Sipi? I prefer to not change this code flow.
Thanks,
Eric
> if (CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig) {
> //
> // ApInitReconfig happens when:
> // 1. AP is re-enabled after it's disabled, in either PEI or DXE phase.
> // 2. AP is initialized in DXE phase.
> // In either case, use the volatile registers value derived from BSP.
> // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters
> points to a
> // different IDT shared by all APs.
> //
> RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters,
> FALSE);
> } else {
> if (CpuMpData->ApLoopMode == ApInHltLoop) {
> //
> // Restore AP's volatile registers saved before AP is halted
> //
> RestoreVolatileRegisters (&CpuMpData-
> >CpuData[ProcessorNumber].VolatileRegisters, TRUE);
> } else {
> //
> // The CPU driver might not flush TLB for APs on spot after updating
> // page attributes. AP in mwait loop mode needs to take care of it when
> // woken up.
> //
> CpuFlushTlb ();
> }
> }
> >
> > + }
> >
> > +
> >
> > //
> >
> > // Execute AP function if AP is ready
> >
> > //
> >
> > --
> > 2.23.0.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#57785): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57785
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/73187416/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > New logic changes code flow when CpuMpData->InitFlag == ApInitReconfig. > In original flow, the code does RestoreVolatileRegisters and CpuFlushTlb, but > new code only does CpuFlushTlb. > Is CpuFlushTlb not needs if wake up through Init-Sipi-Sipi? I prefer to not > change this code flow. In ApInitReconfig path, CPU is waken up from INIT-SIPI-SIPI, which means the CR3 is set in waking up vector. CpuFlushTlb() is used here to invalidate the page table cache, which is similar to setting CR3. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#57808): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57808 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/73187416/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.