1. Patchew
  2. EDK2
  3. [edk2-devel] [patch v2 0/5] Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
  4. View patch

[edk2-devel] [patch v2 2/5] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION

Dandan Bi posted 5 patches 6 years, 4 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[edk2-devel] [patch v2 2/5] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
Posted by Dandan Bi 6 years, 4 months ago 
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.

But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.

This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in DxeCapsuleLibFmp which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.

Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
---
 MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
index 95aa9de087..5dda561a04 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
@@ -1028,10 +1028,19 @@ StartFmpImage (
                   ImageSize,
                   &ImageHandle
                   );
   DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "FmpCapsule: LoadImage - %r\n", Status));
   if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
+    //
+    // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
+    // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
+    // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
+    // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
+    //
+    if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
+      gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
+    }
     FreePool(DriverDevicePath);
     return Status;
   }
 
   DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "FmpCapsule: StartImage ...\n"));
-- 
2.18.0.windows.1


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#47445): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47445
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34184007/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [edk2-devel] [patch v2 2/5] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
Posted by Wu, Hao A 6 years, 4 months ago 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Dandan Bi
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 11:06 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wang, Jian J; Wu, Hao A; Gao, Liming; Laszlo Ersek
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [patch v2 2/5] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp:
> Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
> 
> For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
> the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
> EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
> This follows UEFI Spec.
> 
> But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
> the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
> like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
> EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> 
> This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
> for the callers in DxeCapsuleLibFmp which don't have the policy to defer
> the execution of the image.
> 
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
> Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
> index 95aa9de087..5dda561a04 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
> @@ -1028,10 +1028,19 @@ StartFmpImage (
>                    ImageSize,
>                    &ImageHandle
>                    );
>    DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "FmpCapsule: LoadImage - %r\n", Status));
>    if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
> +    //
> +    // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an
> ImageHandle was created
> +    // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be
> started right now.
> +    // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an
> image, we should
> +    // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> +    //
> +    if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> +      gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> +    }


Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>

Best Regards,
Hao Wu


>      FreePool(DriverDevicePath);
>      return Status;
>    }
> 
>    DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "FmpCapsule: StartImage ...\n"));
> --
> 2.18.0.windows.1
> 
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#47451): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47451
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34184007/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [edk2-devel] [patch v2 2/5] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: Unload image on EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 6 years, 4 months ago 
On 9/18/19 5:05 AM, Dandan Bi wrote:
> For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
> the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
> EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
> This follows UEFI Spec.
> 
> But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
> the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
> like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
> EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> 
> This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
> for the callers in DxeCapsuleLibFmp which don't have the policy to defer
> the execution of the image.
> 
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
> Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
> index 95aa9de087..5dda561a04 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.c
> @@ -1028,10 +1028,19 @@ StartFmpImage (
>                    ImageSize,
>                    &ImageHandle
>                    );
>    DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "FmpCapsule: LoadImage - %r\n", Status));
>    if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
> +    //
> +    // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created
> +    // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
> +    // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an image, we should
> +    // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> +    //
> +    if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> +      gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> +    }
>      FreePool(DriverDevicePath);
>      return Status;
>    }
>  
>    DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "FmpCapsule: StartImage ...\n"));
> 

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#47914): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47914
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34184007/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.