Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h
index e0d823a4b1c6..b95ed8c6f836 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
@retval EFI_SUCCESS The number of processors was retrieved successfully
@retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER NumberOfProcessors is NULL
**/
-
EFI_STATUS
EFIAPI
SmmMpGetNumberOfProcessors (
--
2.18.0.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#44603): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/44603
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32652009/1787277
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On 07/30/19 10:37, Zhang, Shenglei wrote: > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com> > --- > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h > index e0d823a4b1c6..b95ed8c6f836 100644 > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent > @retval EFI_SUCCESS The number of processors was retrieved successfully > @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER NumberOfProcessors is NULL > **/ > - > EFI_STATUS > EFIAPI > SmmMpGetNumberOfProcessors ( > The patch looks good, but I wonder if we should call this empty line "trailing". It is not at the end of the file, and not at the end of a line. Perhaps: UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: keep function comment and declaration adjacent (73 characters). Anyway, I don't feel too strongly about this. Either way: Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Thanks Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#44632): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/44632 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32652009/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Agree with Laszlo's comments. This info is more precise for the issue. Please update the commit message when you push the change. With the commit message updated, reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> Thanks, Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of > Laszlo Ersek > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:11 PM > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com> > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: > Remove trailing white space in SmmMp.h > > On 07/30/19 10:37, Zhang, Shenglei wrote: > > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> > > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com> > > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com> > > --- > > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h > b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h > > index e0d823a4b1c6..b95ed8c6f836 100644 > > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h > > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmMp.h > > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent > > @retval EFI_SUCCESS The number of processors was retrieved > successfully > > @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER NumberOfProcessors is NULL > > **/ > > - > > EFI_STATUS > > EFIAPI > > SmmMpGetNumberOfProcessors ( > > > > The patch looks good, but I wonder if we should call this empty line "trailing". > It is not at the end of the file, and not at the end of a line. Perhaps: > > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: keep function comment and declaration > adjacent > > (73 characters). > > Anyway, I don't feel too strongly about this. Either way: > > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > > Thanks > Laszlo > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#44645): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/44645 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32652009/1787277 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [importer@patchew.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.