The presence of this GUID in the PPI database, and/or in the DXE protocol
database (as dictated by the platform's needs in these firmware phases)
implies that the platform provides the operating system with an ACPI-based
hardware description. This is not necessarily exclusive with other types
of hardware description (for example, a Device Tree-based one).
A platform PEIM and/or DXE driver is supposed to produce a single instance
of the PPI and/or protocol (with NULL contents), if appropriate. The
decision to produce the PPI and/or protocol is platform specific; for
example, in the DXE phase, it could depend on an HII checkbox / underlying
non-volatile UEFI variable.
In the DXE phase, the protocol is meant to be depended-upon by
"MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe", indirectly:
* In the long term, interested platforms will establish this dependency by
hooking an (upcoming) NULL-class DepexLib instance into AcpiTableDxe in
their DSC files, pointing DepexLib's DEPEX through a FixedAtBuild PCD to
the GUID introduced here. (For the prerequisite BaseTools feature, refer
to <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444>).
* In the short term, an interested platform may hook a private NULL-class
library instance (called e.g. "PlatformHasAcpiLib") into AcpiTableDxe.
Such a library instance would be a specialization of the above described
generic DepexLib, with the DEPEX open-coded on the GUID introduced here.
Either way, the platform makes EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL and (if enabled)
EFI_ACPI_SDT_PROTOCOL dependent on the platform's dynamic decision to
produce or not to produce a NULL protocol instance with this GUID.
In turn, other (platform and universal) DXE drivers that produce ACPI
tables will wait for EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL / EFI_ACPI_SDT_PROTOCOL, via
DEPEX, protocol notify, or a simple gBS->LocateProtocol() in a "late
enough" callback (such as Ready To Boot).
Because this GUID is not standard, it is prefixed with EDKII / Edkii, as
seen elsewhere in MdeModulePkg and SecurityPkg. In addition, an effort is
made to avoid the phrase "AcpiPlatform", as that belongs to drivers /
libraries that produce platform specific ACPI content (as opposed to
deciding whether the entire firmware will have access to
EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL, or any similar facilities in the PEI phase).
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
v3:
- rename gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiProtocolGuid to gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid
[Star]
- update commit message and code comments to reflect possible use as a
PPI as well [Star]
- move GUID from ArmPkg to MdeModulePkg [Leif, Ard]
- split PlatformHasAcpiLib to a separate patch [Star]
MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec | 3 ++
MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
index 626e479f5e45..2d94881206d3 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
@@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ [Guids]
gEdkiiNonDiscoverableUhciDeviceGuid = { 0xA8CDA0A2, 0x4F37, 0x4A1B, {0x8E, 0x10, 0x8E, 0xF3, 0xCC, 0x3B, 0xF3, 0xA8 } }
gEdkiiNonDiscoverableXhciDeviceGuid = { 0xB1BE0BC5, 0x6C28, 0x442D, {0xAA, 0x37, 0x15, 0x1B, 0x42, 0x57, 0xBD, 0x78 } }
+ ## Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h
+ gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid = { 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } }
+
[Ppis]
## Include/Ppi/AtaController.h
gPeiAtaControllerPpiGuid = { 0xa45e60d1, 0xc719, 0x44aa, { 0xb0, 0x7a, 0xaa, 0x77, 0x7f, 0x85, 0x90, 0x6d }}
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ad517821375d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/** @file
+ EDKII Platform Has ACPI GUID
+
+ A NULL protocol instance with this GUID in the DXE protocol database, and/or
+ a NULL PPI with this GUID in the PPI database, implies that the platform
+ provides the operating system with an ACPI-based hardware description. Note
+ that this is not necessarily exclusive with different kinds of hardware
+ description (for example, a Device Tree-based one). A platform driver and/or
+ PEIM is supposed to produce a single instance of the protocol and/or PPI
+ (with NULL contents), if appropriate.
+
+ Copyright (C) 2017, Red Hat, Inc.
+
+ This program and the accompanying materials are licensed and made available
+ under the terms and conditions of the BSD License that accompanies this
+ distribution. The full text of the license may be found at
+ http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php.
+
+ THE PROGRAM IS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE BSD LICENSE ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
+ WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
+**/
+
+
+#ifndef __EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_H__
+#define __EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_H__
+
+#define EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_GUID \
+ { \
+ 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, \
+ { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } \
+ }
+
+extern EFI_GUID gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid;
+
+#endif
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
On 24 March 2017 at 22:38, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote: > The presence of this GUID in the PPI database, and/or in the DXE protocol > database (as dictated by the platform's needs in these firmware phases) > implies that the platform provides the operating system with an ACPI-based > hardware description. This is not necessarily exclusive with other types > of hardware description (for example, a Device Tree-based one). > > A platform PEIM and/or DXE driver is supposed to produce a single instance > of the PPI and/or protocol (with NULL contents), if appropriate. The > decision to produce the PPI and/or protocol is platform specific; for > example, in the DXE phase, it could depend on an HII checkbox / underlying > non-volatile UEFI variable. > > In the DXE phase, the protocol is meant to be depended-upon by > "MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe", indirectly: > > * In the long term, interested platforms will establish this dependency by > hooking an (upcoming) NULL-class DepexLib instance into AcpiTableDxe in > their DSC files, pointing DepexLib's DEPEX through a FixedAtBuild PCD to > the GUID introduced here. (For the prerequisite BaseTools feature, refer > to <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444>). > > * In the short term, an interested platform may hook a private NULL-class > library instance (called e.g. "PlatformHasAcpiLib") into AcpiTableDxe. > Such a library instance would be a specialization of the above described > generic DepexLib, with the DEPEX open-coded on the GUID introduced here. > > Either way, the platform makes EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL and (if enabled) > EFI_ACPI_SDT_PROTOCOL dependent on the platform's dynamic decision to > produce or not to produce a NULL protocol instance with this GUID. > > In turn, other (platform and universal) DXE drivers that produce ACPI > tables will wait for EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL / EFI_ACPI_SDT_PROTOCOL, via > DEPEX, protocol notify, or a simple gBS->LocateProtocol() in a "late > enough" callback (such as Ready To Boot). > > Because this GUID is not standard, it is prefixed with EDKII / Edkii, as > seen elsewhere in MdeModulePkg and SecurityPkg. In addition, an effort is > made to avoid the phrase "AcpiPlatform", as that belongs to drivers / > libraries that produce platform specific ACPI content (as opposed to > deciding whether the entire firmware will have access to > EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL, or any similar facilities in the PEI phase). > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > --- > > Notes: > v3: > - rename gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiProtocolGuid to gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid > [Star] > - update commit message and code comments to reflect possible use as a > PPI as well [Star] > - move GUID from ArmPkg to MdeModulePkg [Leif, Ard] > - split PlatformHasAcpiLib to a separate patch [Star] > > MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec | 3 ++ > MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec > index 626e479f5e45..2d94881206d3 100644 > --- a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec > @@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ [Guids] > gEdkiiNonDiscoverableUhciDeviceGuid = { 0xA8CDA0A2, 0x4F37, 0x4A1B, {0x8E, 0x10, 0x8E, 0xF3, 0xCC, 0x3B, 0xF3, 0xA8 } } > gEdkiiNonDiscoverableXhciDeviceGuid = { 0xB1BE0BC5, 0x6C28, 0x442D, {0xAA, 0x37, 0x15, 0x1B, 0x42, 0x57, 0xBD, 0x78 } } > > + ## Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h > + gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid = { 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } } > + > [Ppis] > ## Include/Ppi/AtaController.h > gPeiAtaControllerPpiGuid = { 0xa45e60d1, 0xc719, 0x44aa, { 0xb0, 0x7a, 0xaa, 0x77, 0x7f, 0x85, 0x90, 0x6d }} > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..ad517821375d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +/** @file > + EDKII Platform Has ACPI GUID > + > + A NULL protocol instance with this GUID in the DXE protocol database, and/or > + a NULL PPI with this GUID in the PPI database, implies that the platform > + provides the operating system with an ACPI-based hardware description. Note > + that this is not necessarily exclusive with different kinds of hardware > + description (for example, a Device Tree-based one). A platform driver and/or > + PEIM is supposed to produce a single instance of the protocol and/or PPI > + (with NULL contents), if appropriate. > + > + Copyright (C) 2017, Red Hat, Inc. > + > + This program and the accompanying materials are licensed and made available > + under the terms and conditions of the BSD License that accompanies this > + distribution. The full text of the license may be found at > + http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php. > + > + THE PROGRAM IS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE BSD LICENSE ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT > + WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. > +**/ > + > + > +#ifndef __EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_H__ > +#define __EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_H__ > + > +#define EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_GUID \ > + { \ > + 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, \ > + { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } \ > + } > + > +extern EFI_GUID gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid; > + > +#endif > -- > 2.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
Star, Feng, are you okay with this patch? As we discussed under the v2 thread, BaseTools don't currently generate EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_GUID style macros that are usable for initializing static GUID variables, and GUID fields of static structures. Therefore the MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h file in this patch adds functionality for which BaseTools have no substitute. So, we have the following two options: (1) I can file a BZ for BaseTools to generate the above static initializers, *but* for now, we go with this patch as-is, under MdeModulePkg. If you agree with this, please respond to this patch with your formal Reviewed-by. (2) Or else, I will post a v4 of the series, moving this patch back under ArmPkg, and updating the references in the rest of the patches. Thanks, Laszlo On 03/24/17 23:38, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > The presence of this GUID in the PPI database, and/or in the DXE protocol > database (as dictated by the platform's needs in these firmware phases) > implies that the platform provides the operating system with an ACPI-based > hardware description. This is not necessarily exclusive with other types > of hardware description (for example, a Device Tree-based one). > > A platform PEIM and/or DXE driver is supposed to produce a single instance > of the PPI and/or protocol (with NULL contents), if appropriate. The > decision to produce the PPI and/or protocol is platform specific; for > example, in the DXE phase, it could depend on an HII checkbox / underlying > non-volatile UEFI variable. > > In the DXE phase, the protocol is meant to be depended-upon by > "MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe", indirectly: > > * In the long term, interested platforms will establish this dependency by > hooking an (upcoming) NULL-class DepexLib instance into AcpiTableDxe in > their DSC files, pointing DepexLib's DEPEX through a FixedAtBuild PCD to > the GUID introduced here. (For the prerequisite BaseTools feature, refer > to <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444>). > > * In the short term, an interested platform may hook a private NULL-class > library instance (called e.g. "PlatformHasAcpiLib") into AcpiTableDxe. > Such a library instance would be a specialization of the above described > generic DepexLib, with the DEPEX open-coded on the GUID introduced here. > > Either way, the platform makes EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL and (if enabled) > EFI_ACPI_SDT_PROTOCOL dependent on the platform's dynamic decision to > produce or not to produce a NULL protocol instance with this GUID. > > In turn, other (platform and universal) DXE drivers that produce ACPI > tables will wait for EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL / EFI_ACPI_SDT_PROTOCOL, via > DEPEX, protocol notify, or a simple gBS->LocateProtocol() in a "late > enough" callback (such as Ready To Boot). > > Because this GUID is not standard, it is prefixed with EDKII / Edkii, as > seen elsewhere in MdeModulePkg and SecurityPkg. In addition, an effort is > made to avoid the phrase "AcpiPlatform", as that belongs to drivers / > libraries that produce platform specific ACPI content (as opposed to > deciding whether the entire firmware will have access to > EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL, or any similar facilities in the PEI phase). > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > --- > > Notes: > v3: > - rename gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiProtocolGuid to gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid > [Star] > - update commit message and code comments to reflect possible use as a > PPI as well [Star] > - move GUID from ArmPkg to MdeModulePkg [Leif, Ard] > - split PlatformHasAcpiLib to a separate patch [Star] > > MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec | 3 ++ > MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec > index 626e479f5e45..2d94881206d3 100644 > --- a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec > @@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ [Guids] > gEdkiiNonDiscoverableUhciDeviceGuid = { 0xA8CDA0A2, 0x4F37, 0x4A1B, {0x8E, 0x10, 0x8E, 0xF3, 0xCC, 0x3B, 0xF3, 0xA8 } } > gEdkiiNonDiscoverableXhciDeviceGuid = { 0xB1BE0BC5, 0x6C28, 0x442D, {0xAA, 0x37, 0x15, 0x1B, 0x42, 0x57, 0xBD, 0x78 } } > > + ## Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h > + gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid = { 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } } > + > [Ppis] > ## Include/Ppi/AtaController.h > gPeiAtaControllerPpiGuid = { 0xa45e60d1, 0xc719, 0x44aa, { 0xb0, 0x7a, 0xaa, 0x77, 0x7f, 0x85, 0x90, 0x6d }} > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..ad517821375d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +/** @file > + EDKII Platform Has ACPI GUID > + > + A NULL protocol instance with this GUID in the DXE protocol database, and/or > + a NULL PPI with this GUID in the PPI database, implies that the platform > + provides the operating system with an ACPI-based hardware description. Note > + that this is not necessarily exclusive with different kinds of hardware > + description (for example, a Device Tree-based one). A platform driver and/or > + PEIM is supposed to produce a single instance of the protocol and/or PPI > + (with NULL contents), if appropriate. > + > + Copyright (C) 2017, Red Hat, Inc. > + > + This program and the accompanying materials are licensed and made available > + under the terms and conditions of the BSD License that accompanies this > + distribution. The full text of the license may be found at > + http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php. > + > + THE PROGRAM IS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE BSD LICENSE ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT > + WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. > +**/ > + > + > +#ifndef __EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_H__ > +#define __EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_H__ > + > +#define EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_GUID \ > + { \ > + 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, \ > + { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } \ > + } > + > +extern EFI_GUID gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid; > + > +#endif > _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.