The Count parameter of RShiftU64() must be strictly smaller than 64.
ProcessCmdAddPointer() and ProcessCmdWritePointer() currently ensure this
by "cleverly" breaking the last bit of a potentially 8-byte right shift
out to a separate operation.
Instead, exclude the Count==64 case explicitly (in which case the
preexistent outer RShiftU64() would return 0), and keep only the inner
RShiftU64(), with the direct Count however.
This is not a functional change, just style improvement.
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---
OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c b/OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c
index eadd690bef4e..6a0ecd1ad962 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c
+++ b/OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c
@@ -277,8 +277,8 @@ ProcessCmdAddPointer (
ASSERT ((UINTN)Blob2->Base <= MAX_ADDRESS - Blob2->Size);
PointerValue += (UINT64)(UINTN)Blob2->Base;
- if (RShiftU64 (
- RShiftU64 (PointerValue, AddPointer->PointerSize * 8 - 1), 1) != 0) {
+ if (AddPointer->PointerSize < 8 &&
+ RShiftU64 (PointerValue, AddPointer->PointerSize * 8) != 0) {
DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: relocated pointer value unrepresentable in "
"\"%a\"\n", __FUNCTION__, AddPointer->PointerFile));
return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
@@ -438,8 +438,8 @@ ProcessCmdWritePointer (
ASSERT ((UINTN)PointeeBlob->Base <= MAX_ADDRESS - PointeeBlob->Size);
PointerValue += (UINT64)(UINTN)PointeeBlob->Base;
- if (RShiftU64 (
- RShiftU64 (PointerValue, WritePointer->PointerSize * 8 - 1), 1) != 0) {
+ if (WritePointer->PointerSize < 8 &&
+ RShiftU64 (PointerValue, WritePointer->PointerSize * 8) != 0) {
DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: pointer value unrepresentable in \"%a\"\n",
__FUNCTION__, WritePointer->PointerFile));
return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel