Thanks for the feedback Peter. Removing the redundant check on bit
23 and adding checks for the "should be" bits as well (bits [11:8]).
The following patch should make sure we are not treating
architecturally Undefined instructions as a SWP, by verifying
the opcodes as per section A8.8.229 of ARMv7-A specification.
Best,
Onur
Signed-off-by: Onur Sahin <onursahin08@gmail.com>
---
target/arm/translate.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/translate.c b/target/arm/translate.c
index ba6ab7d..1fb0b8f 100644
--- a/target/arm/translate.c
+++ b/target/arm/translate.c
@@ -9227,11 +9227,14 @@ static void disas_arm_insn(DisasContext *s, unsigned int insn)
}
}
tcg_temp_free_i32(addr);
- } else {
+ } else if ((insn & 0x00300f00) == 0) {
+ /* 0bcccc_0001_0x00_xxxx_xxxx_0000_1001_xxxx
+ * - SWP, SWPB
+ */
+
TCGv taddr;
TCGMemOp opc = s->be_data;
- /* SWP instruction */
rm = (insn) & 0xf;
if (insn & (1 << 22)) {
@@ -9249,6 +9252,8 @@ static void disas_arm_insn(DisasContext *s, unsigned int insn)
get_mem_index(s), opc);
tcg_temp_free(taddr);
store_reg(s, rd, tmp);
+ } else {
+ goto illegal_op;
}
}
} else {
--
1.8.3.1