From nobody Wed Dec 17 10:19:54 2025 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6015720DD7D for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 05:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743138267; cv=none; b=K8h6LTEKbby2PrxEjnsE+RLOb1uVkfXkAjbNZ3umbWyljG5SgahjQfOk6H6EshGfntcsQZDNYbv+xZitjaUkW+DOVRgnUIFHHMDX8XXPeQA+G+uAjOPnWVMTRd4m+7cp8u7rf2rfkg15S/hZ/h64eJ32rBKtMdfSeohhzl405Ng= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743138267; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1yj8dhgzDIV8G0WRIClQNYLJgUPmkwlcqABMXs/7pjg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=tlyareZQWC36ERI7exWL7xC7IZG8E/LtQJP1oQ5h31GYvT8Zzg/5kPsnSSJwyVb//4/YptMU9eS0IfrMuey1ERY6NHBAEBRlv9uxTHWOHobcvCDZk1auP4hZyTQY2VDNuQB5cRZg9BV3kUikVV4CbTQYuqFCP/3EBjmiVYO+RBA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WL+fZg6v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WL+fZg6v" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7498C4CEEE; Fri, 28 Mar 2025 05:04:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1743138266; bh=1yj8dhgzDIV8G0WRIClQNYLJgUPmkwlcqABMXs/7pjg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WL+fZg6v+ghExi/6DoqKiuFO0T3wgr8pLyItZozndv6ZrWky5ZjnW1t7ia4h7Edtf jl8zTlR3u/Mn5UfTFXIaV7FNgq/4Lr22Unh7xBIUTV0Dk0VgQWXhMxT0owKez/z9YH 0h0ngMX/GCgH+ngxBD1UFvIOU2GopXGo40z4/GD/6uuUEcM9y/Djne82ogFNShPmZl kT41JifkmyAxdmwTjslASB16ZCg/N7BG2trVgxQ2MpUjcRbLuskfVUauCBtmQ734kb WcmwCfoVsdfCEtCaXmWGtWPtCg4v/VTNSaHXEgyPqdib3e9UJsMi4GLgodRlm6oQU5 oPJ6+cegCBr8w== From: Josh Poimboeuf To: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Arnd Bergmann Subject: [PATCH 3/3] objtool, drm/vmwgfx: Don't ignore vmw_send_msg() for ORC Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:04:23 -0700 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The following commit: 0b0d81e3b733 ("objtool, drm/vmwgfx: Fix "duplicate frame pointer save" wa= rning") ... marked vmw_send_msg() STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD because it uses RBP in a non-standard way which violates frame pointer convention. That issue only affects the frame pointer unwinder. Remove the annotation for ORC. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf --- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/v= mwgfx_msg.c index 1f15990d3934..1d9a42cbc88f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static int vmw_send_msg(struct rpc_channel *channel, co= nst char *msg) =20 return -EINVAL; } -STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(vmw_send_msg); +STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD_FP(vmw_send_msg); =20 =20 /** --=20 2.48.1